on Chinese scientists claim record smashing quantum computing breakthrough · c/technology · 10 pts · 2yThe only real problem I am aware of is breaking some types of public key encryption. Which is kinda bad because post quantum encryption is still in its infancy.
on zsh or fish for an intermediate Linux user? · c/linux · 1 pts · 3yThank you. Will take a look as well.
on zsh or fish for an intermediate Linux user? · c/linux · 2 pts · 3yThanks for pointing me at tide. I always used the pure prompt but tide looks like pure on steroids.
on It's so nice to see them all growing, but this is just the truth, sorry. · c/memes · 5 pts · 3yThank you for your answer. I will read the article you linked. I initially was just very irritated by your comment because it sounded like closed source is more secure in general. Have a nice evening too.
on It's so nice to see them all growing, but this is just the truth, sorry. · c/memes · 15 pts · 3y Sync is popular because its closed source makes it harder to break the security aspect if you don't have all the access to source code. Do I understand correctly that you mean, that closed source makes something more secure? I believe that open source can be more secure because: More people looked at the source code thus more bugs have been discovered. Bad actors will get a hold of your code anyways. Especially mobile apps should be easy to reverse engineer. Intentional backdoors are easier to hide in closed source applications. There might be more arguments, but I think you get the point.
The only real problem I am aware of is breaking some types of public key encryption. Which is kinda bad because post quantum encryption is still in its infancy.
Thank you. Will take a look as well.
Thanks for pointing me at tide. I always used the pure prompt but tide looks like pure on steroids.
Thank you for your answer. I will read the article you linked.
I initially was just very irritated by your comment because it sounded like closed source is more secure in general.
Have a nice evening too.
Do I understand correctly that you mean, that closed source makes something more secure?
I believe that open source can be more secure because:
There might be more arguments, but I think you get the point.