Thanks! LORAN A sounded a lot different. It operated around 1.8 MHz. It was more of a droning, like a piston engine airpland cruising along. LORAN C operates at 100 kHz and sounds more impulse or digital to me. I was actively listening in the late 1960s and LORAN A went away in favor of LORAN C in the early 70s. Soundtrack of my youth, along with WWV😂
I meant, library equivalent to the Internet Archive. Well, I imagine the NSA has one, but…
Thanks!
ps, I ran across the Radio South Africa sign-off on YouTube a while back. It seemed very exotic to me as a kid listening on my radio in Washington State.
There’s no equivalent SWL library I know of to record the sounds of various shortwave tech as it passes away never to be heard from again, e.g. Loran A signals on 1.85/1.95 MHz. Same for ships at sea.
@mattblaze@federate.social
part of the rabbit hole you sent me down 😂
https://www.radiomarine.org/
@kyhwana @mattblaze
Thanks! LORAN A sounded a lot different. It operated around 1.8 MHz. It was more of a droning, like a piston engine airpland cruising along. LORAN C operates at 100 kHz and sounds more impulse or digital to me. I was actively listening in the late 1960s and LORAN A went away in favor of LORAN C in the early 70s. Soundtrack of my youth, along with WWV😂
@mattblaze@federate.social
I meant, library equivalent to the Internet Archive. Well, I imagine the NSA has one, but…
Thanks!
ps, I ran across the Radio South Africa sign-off on YouTube a while back. It seemed very exotic to me as a kid listening on my radio in Washington State.
https://youtu.be/2JZ8N_gk9SY?si=SNmyoGM02R7sVaJe
@mattblaze@federate.social
There’s no equivalent SWL library I know of to record the sounds of various shortwave tech as it passes away never to be heard from again, e.g. Loran A signals on 1.85/1.95 MHz. Same for ships at sea.
@stux@geddit.social @stux@mstdn.social
quiet! cat sleeping…