There's a big difference between "touched up" as in, fix the contrast and adjust the color balance, versus "touched up" as in let's make a nebula look like a bat. The first, me and Ricky are in agreement that they're doing. The second, me and Snopes feel strongly that they're not doing.
10 Comments
mozz@mbin.grits.dev · 18 pts · 2y
It legit looks like an AI image generator was told to generate a nebula that's also a bat
Anticorp@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
I feel like this has definitely been touched up.
Mr_Blott@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y
Pervert
rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 2y
NASA always touches up their photographs to add color and contrast or else space would look very boring.
mozz@mbin.grits.dev · 2 pts · 2y
I highly doubt NASA is in the business of doing that (and FWIW Snopes agrees with me).
Anticorp@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
Read the comment right above yours:
https://lemm.ee/comment/8535233
mozz@mbin.grits.dev · 4 pts · 2y
There's a big difference between "touched up" as in, fix the contrast and adjust the color balance, versus "touched up" as in let's make a nebula look like a bat. The first, me and Ricky are in agreement that they're doing. The second, me and Snopes feel strongly that they're not doing.
MrJameGumb@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2y
Kolanaki@yiffit.net · 8 pts · 2y
Whoa. It looks like a bat. Not like the horse head nebula, which looks more like a headless human to me.
Amro@kbin.social · 3 pts · 2y
@fossilesque Geez... Scarecrow, this stuff is fucked up! Ya sure about this dosage?
fossilesque@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 2y