c/technology · by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social · 2yAI-generated articles prompt Wikipedia to downgrade CNET’s reliability rating https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/02/wikipedia-downgrades-cnets-reliability-rating-after-ai-generated-articles/Futurism report highlights the reputational cost of publishing AI-generated content. 72 points · 5 comments · view on lemmy.world
5 Comments
Toes@ani.social · 8 pts · 2y
CNET has been spam for a long time
Fredselfish@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y
Any news site using Chatbots to right their articles should not be trusted.
jet@hackertalks.com · 5 pts · 2y
Wait.. is Wikipedia publishing original research?!?!??!
CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 2y
Are these the people behind #1 malware site download.com? lmao should've been done ages ago
drawerair@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
I learned that Wikipedia has a "reliable sources" table thanks to this. I'll check it out.
I can't recall a time when I went to Cnet to read re tech. I get tech stuff from Youtube and Verge.
The Wikipedia folks didn't demote Cnet after 1 week of discussion. Not 1 month. Not 6 months. Were they giving Cnet time to change for the better?