The one simple trick Candle Makers don't want you to know

(title added for lemmy by community mod)

Image description: Four images showing a candle burning down with the melting wax being collected inside a transparent candlestick resulting in another candle being formed.


(Originally published earlier today on aus.social) - Click the Fedi-Link to visit.

96 points · 17 comments · view on lemmy.world

17 Comments

vampire@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 2y (4 replies)

The wax is the fuel... Ah fuck it. Infinite candle. I see nothing wrong with this.

esc27@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y

This is nothing. Try plugging a surge protector into itself. Infinite power!!!

abbadon420@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I want to believe

Hupf@feddit.de · 2 pts · 2y

Light the candle you want to see in the world.

dgar@aus.social · 1 pts · 2y

@vampire 😂🤣

the_third@feddit.de · 20 pts · 2y (2 replies)
[ removed ]
wise_pancake@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 2y

I think there might be some savings here, less wax is heated by the candle, so less will evaporate. But I don’t know enough about candles to know whether that’s significant.

At best this gives a marginal increase in duration for the price of twice as much wick.

Anticorp@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

Those are special candles. Old timey candles dripped wax everywhere.

CitizenKong@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y (2 replies)

Without the wick the new candle won't burn for very long. Or at all.

atkion@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 2y (1 reply)

it looks like there’s another wick preloaded into the bottom half

CitizenKong@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

Oh yeah, that would work. But only once.

lettruthout@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y (2 replies)

'Having trouble believing that the wax wouldn't cool before it got much beyond the flame, much less all the way to the bottom of that container.

CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 2y

It would be far better to just recycle the wax left over normally. Especially because most of it actually does burn in a typical candle design.

dgar@aus.social · 4 pts · 2y

@lettruthout
Yeah, I wouldn’t trust this image as far as I could scroll it.

Missmuffet@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2y

You can just put the candle in the container to begin with haha

iAvicenna@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y

this is against the sixth law of thermodynamics which says infinite candles are impossible

HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 2y

Infinite candle glitch

Feathercrown@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I like how you can see it would only give you about 1/3 of the candle back (3rd image), because the wax is what burns

dgar@aus.social · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
Anticorp@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
[ removed ]