Everything I Know About the Xz Backdoor

https://boehs.org/node/everything-i-know-about-the-xz-backdoor

149 points · 9 comments · view on lemmy.world

9 Comments

psmgx@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 2y (2 replies)

Sounds like a concerted effort by a reasonably competent state actor. The +0800 timezone offset implies parts of Asia and is a small but crucial detail, esp given the commit times. In other words, China, Malaysia, Korea, etc. -- somewhere in Asia.

OTOH the author even concedes identity theft or smart attempts to discredit and point at Asia. Still, is on par for Chinese and NK actors.

sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works · 23 pts · 2y

It could also be the opposite, someone trying to act like one of the Asian countries. The article lists the UTC times for the commits at 12-17, which would correspond to 8AM-1PM EST or 5-10AM PDT. That also could be fudged, or it could be a relatively new US spook working primarily in the mornings. Or if it's someone in Asia, that's 8PM-1AM, which is the perfect time for an evening hacker.

It's really not clear who's behind it.

I'm guessing an independent hacker in Asia because a state actor would probably just exploit existing bugs instead of adding new ones, and they certainly wouldn't do something as obvious as "safe_fprintf -> fprintf." I'm guessing this is all one individual trying to create business for themselves.

mwguy@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 2y

In other words, China, Malaysia, Korea, etc. – somewhere in Asia.

The Shadow Broker's leaks showed that state actors had whole tool suites to ensure that the product appeared like it was coming from a different location. Given that those tools have been leaked since 2016 and the concept is even older; relying on metadata like timezones, character set, etc... to make determinations about location is unreliable at best.

blarth@thelemmy.club · 22 pts · 2y (2 replies)

What a wild read. Definitely smells like nation state actor.

Ashtefere@aussie.zone · 4 pts · 2y

Timeframes of commits line up with afternoon/evening in Moscow.

Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 2y

I'm not really convinced. I haven't seen anything outside the capabilities of a talented individual, and such an exploit would be worth a lot of money, so the motivation is there.

fluxion@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 2y (1 reply)

It's so disgusting to think that Jigar Kumar guy pressuring the original maintainer was Jia himself just manipulating his way into a maintainer role.

I hate people sometimes.

darkpanda@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 2y

It may not have a been a single person in the first place. “Jia” may have just been a front for multiple people or a team of people working together to facilitate the whole situation.

Pika@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 2y

this is insane that it lasted as long as it was before found. I'm glad that was quickly resolved before it hit stable.

protozoan_ninja@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y
[ removed ]