WhatsApp is getting an AI chatbot because of course it is

https://www.gsmarena.com/whatsapp_is_getting_an_ai_chatbot_because_of_course_it_is-news-62429.php

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/14392924

WhatsApp is getting an AI chatbot because of course it is

89 points · 15 comments · view on lemmy.world

15 Comments

TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world · 39 pts · 2y (9 replies)

I am so very tired of every company nonsensically shoehorning "AI" into their software to appease shareholders and investors. Discord shut down their AI chatbot in less than a year -- take notes from that.

nicoag@lemmy.ml · 15 pts · 2y (7 replies)

It also attracts users. Using fad "tech" terminology makes them feel superior than the rest. They think "Oh I'm a tech expert because I use an AI toaster".

Another good example are "gaming" web browsers. Some people actually think they're better (beyond the looks).

This is a basic marketing strategy. It actually works (just for selling nonsense, of course).

LostXOR@fedia.io · 11 pts · 2y (6 replies)
[ removed ]
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee · 10 pts · 2y (2 replies)

And Safari. But that's hardware locked, so it's not really better - it's just not based on Chromium.

Willdrick@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

If you're on Linux, gnome-web uses the same engine as safari. And it's a mess

Safari is the new ie6

Edit: also blink (used by anything chromium) is based off WebKit (safari)

soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 2y

Safari is the best browser if you're running Mac hardware on battery and care about power usage.

It's just in another League when it comes to optimisation

original_reader@lemm.ee · 0 pts · 2y (2 replies)

I generally agree.

Nonetheless, Vivaldi does outclass the clones.

breadsmasher@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2y (1 reply)

“all the clones are the same except my clone

greyw0lv@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 2y

What exactly are "all the clones" I know opera gx, and Vivaldi are on this list, but what other 'clones' exist?

helenslunch@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
airwhale@mastodon.social · 8 pts · 2y (1 reply)

@schizoidman

Adding ChatGPT to chat apps will save users a lot of copy/pasting, right. South Park perfectly described a use case last year.

https://youtu.be/hEk0Tas7xgE?si=jkUh9Zesb-2GoKgS

PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks · 3 pts · 2y

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/hEk0Tas7xgE?si=jkUh9Zesb-2GoKgS

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee · 3 pts · 2y

I don't mind this at all. My friends already are not interested in anything I say so I might aswell chat with the AI like I already do with chatGPT.

jeena@jemmy.jeena.net · 2 pts · 2y (2 replies)

I think this is a easier way to interact with a chatbot than installing an extra app which behaves differently, etc. There are so many features I don't use in software but others do, so why not.

Actually this makes me think if I could use facebooks llama via matrix on element, instead needing to run it on the command line.

rimu@piefed.social · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Yeah, it's nicely integrated. Also because it's on my phone there is the option to use the voice input mode of the keyboard which is a vibe. Talking with an ai feels different.

supangle@lemmy.wtf · 2 pts · 2y

this article and post screams "SWITCH TO SIGNAL MESSAGING RN!" to me