Corbyn, who led Labour between 2015 and 2019, was initially expelled from the party and had the whip withdrawn in April 2020, under the leadership of his erstwhile ally Keir Starmer.
The expulsion came after Corbyn said that claims of antisemitism during his time as a leader had been "overstated" for political reasons, in response to an investigation into his handling of the issue.
14 Comments
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 2y
For those out of the loop, Corbyn spoke out against israel which is a big no-no
anlumo@feddit.de · 8 pts · 2y
IIRC the complaint was that he wasn’t harsh enough on his colleagues who said some things that could be interpreted as anti-semitic.
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 2y
He was very obviously thrown out by israel
You can see where this is going. Also the claim from Ms Peake is factually correct.
Amnesty Interntional - With Whom are Many U.S. Police Departments Training? With a Chronic Human Rights Violator – Israel
Risk@feddit.uk · 24 pts · 2y
Corbyn was absolutely shit smeared by the press; if you get people to look at Corbyn's Labour policies in isolation, I reckon you'd be hard pressed to find someone that disliked them.
I wonder why privately held media would do this...
Devi@kbin.social · 4 pts · 2y
There was a large campaign at the time to suggest anti-zionist was the same as anti-semetic.
Mrkawfee@feddit.uk · 14 pts · 2y
Best of luck to him. The Zionist orchestrated smear campaign, backed by the red Tories, was a disgrace and a chilling sign of how far the Israel lobby has ensconced itself into UK politics.
We need to push back against the AIPAC-isation of our democracy.
Wanderer@lemm.ee · -1 pts · 2y
I was interested in this guy at the time. But in hindsight I'm glad he never made it to PM or Ukraine would have been worse. Can't see him doing what was required as an PM.
Squeak@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 2y
What’s the point? He won’t win by any stretch of the imagination, and the majority of votes he does get will be taken from the pool of voters who would ordinarily vote labour. All this does is benefit the tories. He’d be far better supporting Starmer, even if he doesn’t really.
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2y
Corbyn doesn't support Genocide and Starmer is practically a Tory that did a coup in Labour.
florge@feddit.uk · 8 pts · 2y
Because compromise is what got us in this mess in the first place.
Womble@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2y
I dont think thats a relevant concern in Islington North. The Labour vote at the last election was 3 times all other parties combined and has been Labour (or a Labour spin off mp) since 1937, this is going to be a straight up 2 way fight between Corbyn and whoever Labour put up against him.
Risk@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 2y
Was he not very popular in his constituency though?
tal@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 2y
I guess he could be trying to intentionally play a spoiler role. Like, he'd have to want Labour policy changes, believe that Labour adopting those changes wouldn't make Labour lose in the general election, and believe that he could split off enough votes to cause Labour to lose so that it has to give him those concessions if it wants him not to run.
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world · -8 pts · 2y
People like that are just in for their own personal aggrandisement. He'd rather burn down everything than admit he was wrong.