yup thats the intended solution, im not really familiar with taylor series yet, but maybe for a person who knows taylor series would be able to see it right away
There closest I was able to do on the fly was to show that the ::: pairwise sum has an integral of -ln(2)/2 ::: but that was pretty hand wavy. I'll have to check how it's actually done.
4 Comments
wisha@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 2y
::: spoiler spoiler ln(2) because the Taylor series for ln(1+x) evaluated at x=1 is exactly this series. ::: Good one. Thanks for posting!
siriusmart@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
yup thats the intended solution, im not really familiar with taylor series yet, but maybe for a person who knows taylor series would be able to see it right away
siriusmart@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
Hint ::: spoiler spoiler The solution I have in mind is related to the Taylor series :::
Hint 2 ::: spoiler spoiler It converges to -ln(2), but why :::
Solution: ::: spoiler spoiler https://gmtex.siri.sh/fs/1/School/Extra/Maths/Qotd%20solutions/2024-06-02-alternating_harmonic.html
:::
quilan@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
There closest I was able to do on the fly was to show that the ::: pairwise sum has an integral of -ln(2)/2 ::: but that was pretty hand wavy. I'll have to check how it's actually done.
DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 2y