Anybody understand what these look like? They say 4cm monoliths, but I'm having trouble visualising "lattice monolith" that's 4 cm big. The terminology seems contradictory; but maybe it's a matter of perception?
They mention this other article as a source at the bottom, it has pictures. Just high surface area objects made of reactive materials and 3d printing is an easy way to make them
5 Comments
onlinepersona@programming.dev · -1 pts · 2y
Anybody understand what these look like? They say 4cm monoliths, but I'm having trouble visualising "lattice monolith" that's 4 cm big. The terminology seems contradictory; but maybe it's a matter of perception?
Anti Commercial-AI license
Wasabi@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 2y
There are a few pictures in the article linked.
onlinepersona@programming.dev · -1 pts · 2y
This is what I'm seeing. Are you seeing something else?
Anti Commercial-AI license
Wasabi@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 2y
Sorry, my dumbass Lemmy client copied the wrong link. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894724058558
vcmj@programming.dev · 2 pts · 2y
They mention this other article as a source at the bottom, it has pictures. Just high surface area objects made of reactive materials and 3d printing is an easy way to make them
https://www.bath.ac.uk/announcements/health-threat-forever-chemicals-removed-from-water-with-3d-printed-ceramic-ink/