At the center of the debate are key changes in the language used to describe Zionism, the movement that called for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in what is now Israel.
The 2023 version of the page framed Zionism as a nationalist movement born in the 19th century that sought to secure Jewish self-determination.
In contrast, the 2024 version of the entry introduces more charged terminology, describing Zionism as an “ethno-cultural nationalist” movement that engaged in “colonization of a land outside of Europe,” with a heightened focus on the resulting conflicts with Palestinian Arabs.
“Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible,” it reads.
21 Comments
carl_dungeon@lemmy.world · 63 pts · 1y
I mean, if the shoe fucking fits right?
inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world · 55 pts · 1y
Where is the lie?
slacktoid@lemmy.ml · 48 pts · 1y
About fucking time Wikipedia
Daerun@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 1y
Wikipedia is always updating its content to be more accurate.
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 1y
Destiny in shambles
oberstoffensichtlich@feddit.org · -3 pts · 1y
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 1y
A notorious Zionist who gets all his propaganda from Wikipedia.
oberstoffensichtlich@feddit.org · -7 pts · 1y
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 1y
No Destiny reads debunked propaganda. In his "debate" with Finkelstein he claimed Finkelstein lied about those four boys on a beach by quoting the IDF's debunked statement about a "Hamas compound" which was never found.
Destiny is a very poorly researched Hasbara troll.
GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 1y
He's a notorious Zionism apologist
communism@lemmy.ml · 18 pts · 1y
That's how Zionists themselves define Zionism, so...
PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml · 12 pts · 1y
Yea, but you aren't supposed to actually SAY that.
mearce@programming.dev · 2 pts · 1y
Did this happen in an official capacity/appears in writing? Or is this just the common understanding?
/gen
communism@lemmy.ml · 12 pts · 1y
Yes, Herzl himself referred to Zionism as a colonial movement. In a 1902 letter to Cecil Rhodes:
The first Zionist banks were called "Jewish Colonial Trust" too. The nascent Zionist movement was always an openly colonial project. I suppose now that colonialism is not the cool thing to do anymore some Zionists are shying away from the term, but some still do openly identify their politics that way.
Sakychu@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1y
I mean so what? The references always called it a colonization..
dessalines@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 1y
Some quotes from the founder af Zionism, Theodore Herzl:
miljadisra@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
Immigrants Pirates no shame stealing Palestinian land.
reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 1y
Maybe I'll finally donate.
Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee · 3 pts · 1y
The jewish and the palestinians have something in common. They were both driven from their home. It's a shame that coexistence wasn't the way it went but that's humans for you... everyone who isn't one of you is an other, and humans hate others.
Peace seems to always lose.
anarcho_blinkenist@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 1y
Maybe the Zionists should have taken that to the EUROPEANS WHO DID THAT and forced seizure of THEIR land and made THEM compensate; not passed that shit off on palestinians and colonize them who had nothing to do with european judeophobia. equating these two is ridiculous because the Palestinians are resisting against THE VERY PEOPLE WHO TOOK THEIR LAND, rather than going to some other, poorer place, and getting funneled weapons to brutalize and colonize and genocide them. You don't see Palestinians driving tanks and bombs into Namibian villages and mass murdering them and stealing their land.
These things are not equal and it takes real liberal 'enlightened centrist' brainworms to speak in such vapid vacant platitudes as you are doing. friend your brain needs dewormed.
anarcho_blinkenist@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y
wikipedia more accurate on Israeli occupation than the politics of Ukrainian nazi groups like azov and right sektor who would've thought
RandomGuy79@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 1y
What does it say about Arab colonists
Linkerbaan@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
Conquest is when territory is incorporated into a state or empire. That means a new system of governance for the population of a land. Examples are the Romans and Arabs.
Settler colonialism is when a non native population decides to migrate to already inhabited land by murdering and/or expelling the natives. Examples are israel and Apartheid South Africa