You know, I reject moral absolutism, but this is one case where I feel fine saying that this is a form of evil. It's absolutely, 100% wrong, no matter what the book is. You never, ever destroy things in a library. Period, and that even goes for stuff I'd object to in other contexts.
It's one of those things where once you cross that line, you've become something horrible.
5 Comments
southsamurai@sh.itjust.works · 31 pts · 1y
You know, I reject moral absolutism, but this is one case where I feel fine saying that this is a form of evil. It's absolutely, 100% wrong, no matter what the book is. You never, ever destroy things in a library. Period, and that even goes for stuff I'd object to in other contexts.
It's one of those things where once you cross that line, you've become something horrible.
henfredemars@infosec.pub · 5 pts · 1y
On the whole people are so disrespectful.
Jank@literature.cafe · 4 pts · 1y
Remember, it's not any being anti LGBTQ+, that would be terrible. It's about catching TOP SECRET BUT SOMEHOW COMPLETELY PUBLIC PORNOGRAPHY..
...It just happens to always involve any LGBTQ+ books and anything that discusses that sexy sexy Holocaust.
massive_bereavement@fedia.io · 1 pts · 1y
I'm pretty sure they can be count with one hand.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 1y
So the cases should go through the system quicker. They need to Amazon in a new copy and start their community service doing maintenance work.