Wow. It's almost like we've been warning for years that putting backdoors into software, systems, and encryption would allow nefarious parties to exploit them.
Well yeah but then they'd have to expand the hiring pool beyond the dumbest jock you knew in high school and those people tend to balk at doing fascism so...
Oh absolutely, but it does do something that I'm not sure people realize: it normalizes the idea of a government agent holding the keys to all of your stuff.
The bad part is when people take a luggage lock and use it for their Gym locker, or the locker at the pool. Somewhere that really REALLY shouldn't be using a weak lock with a readily available master key.
Only Apple can use that data for profit! Now the Alphabet agencies just buy that data from brokers..... I just realized how funny the parent company to Google name change is.
The pioneers of this dirty business were overwhelmingly founded by ex-Israeli signals intelligence personnel,
That's interesting. Must be a coincidence.
and related Clinton-era initiatives, like the failed Clipper Chip program, which would have put a spy chip in every computer, and, eventually, every phone and gadget:
"Don't worry, guys we tried to backdoor all devices but failed, see?"
Meanwhile, Intel ME, AMD "Secure Processor", and ARM "TrustZone":
Same. The OP article is interesting, but was hoping for more than a few wiki links of past instances. Is there more verifiable evidence for this instance? Don't doubt the claim, just curious.
Kinda coincides in time with Israel becoming less of a normal West-aligned state and more of a spoiled child whom everyone pats, not very well-behaving at that.
Though TBH this was the case under Reagan too. It's just that there's difference between support for Israel and Israel's penetration back.
I think you should watch this Great Video by CCC,de on Intel ME it has some great facts and information on the deal with IntelME without all the fearmongering and conspiracy theories other videos and blogs usually pump out.
36 Comments
chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world · 334 pts · 1y
Wow. It's almost like we've been warning for years that putting backdoors into software, systems, and encryption would allow nefarious parties to exploit them.
gaiussabinus@lemmy.world · 141 pts · 1y
Think about the children . It will make it easier for police to access instead of doing actual police work and getting a warrant.
anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 55 pts · 1y
Well yeah but then they'd have to expand the hiring pool beyond the dumbest jock you knew in high school and those people tend to balk at doing fascism so...
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works · 31 pts · 1y
Hey, be fair! They also hire the three bullies who hung out by the bleachers smoking cigarettes.
Lennny@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1y
Sorry, I only think of children during school shootings, it's easier that way.
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 1y
you don't want police to think about children, or atleast I don't.
Reverendender@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 1y
BMTea@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 1y
The FBI is the nefarious party lol
DogWater@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Waco intensifies
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 149 pts · 1y
almost1337@lemm.ee · 67 pts · 1y
If the door exists, then it can be opened
uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 48 pts · 1y
And this is why the NSA is supposed to close exploits rather than harvest them for surveillance.
This is why surveillance backdoors are always bad, and you can't math around that.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
Can't weasel around math you mean? They don't think they can, it's collateral damage.
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org · -27 pts · 1y
chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 1y
Oh hey, I found a random 8 year old video.
Random...
https://youtu.be/VPBH1eW28mo
Th4tGuyII@fedia.io · 127 pts · 1y
What?? But the FBI called dibs on that backdoor! /s
It's almost like putting backdoors into software as a whole is a bad idea cause anyone who knows of it can use it, not just "tHe GoOd GuYs"
sukhmel@programming.dev · 4 pts · 1y
…and the ones who don't know of it will one day become the ones who know
NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world · 73 pts · 1y
Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works · 69 pts · 1y
This article is getting saved, for the next time some idiot proposes 'lawful backdoors', which will inevitably happen.
Bytemeister@lemmy.world · 34 pts · 1y
Nervously glances at TPM and TSA approved locks.
Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 26 pts · 1y
I still love the fact that those TSA keys are all available online as 3D files and likely as metal as well
NaibofTabr@infosec.pub · 7 pts · 1y
So, let's talk about common keys.
henfredemars@infosec.pub · 4 pts · 1y
I know for a fact you can get a metal set for a few dollars plus shipping.
anzo@programming.dev · 2 pts · 1y
Those locks are kinda optional. And luggage is way less important than all of one's communication ; imho.
Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 1y
Oh absolutely, but it does do something that I'm not sure people realize: it normalizes the idea of a government agent holding the keys to all of your stuff.
Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
The bad part is when people take a luggage lock and use it for their Gym locker, or the locker at the pool. Somewhere that really REALLY shouldn't be using a weak lock with a readily available master key.
Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
I just went and looked, set of multiple TSA master keys for sale online, numbered with which ones they are the master keys for.
where_am_i@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1y
Amius@pawb.social · 45 pts · 1y
I remember them trying to get Apple to put in a back door as well
horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 1y
Only Apple can use that data for profit! Now the Alphabet agencies just buy that data from brokers..... I just realized how funny the parent company to Google name change is.
the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 1y
asexualchangeling@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y
KonalaKoala@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
At least they were not talking about Lemmy, Mastodon, etc. like someone is trying to screw up the Fediverse.
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org · 3 pts · 1y
LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org · 39 pts · 1y
Article author struggles with clean links
https://www.wsj.com/tech/cybersecurity/u-s-wiretap-systems-targeted-in-china-linked-hack btw
That's interesting. Must be a coincidence.
"Don't worry, guys we tried to backdoor all devices but failed, see?"
Meanwhile, Intel ME, AMD "Secure Processor", and ARM "TrustZone":
dan@upvote.au · 4 pts · 1y
That link is a 404 for me.
betabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 1y
Same. The OP article is interesting, but was hoping for more than a few wiki links of past instances. Is there more verifiable evidence for this instance? Don't doubt the claim, just curious.
Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee · -1 pts · 1y
rottingleaf@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
Kinda coincides in time with Israel becoming less of a normal West-aligned state and more of a spoiled child whom everyone pats, not very well-behaving at that.
Though TBH this was the case under Reagan too. It's just that there's difference between support for Israel and Israel's penetration back.
sukhmel@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1y
The link is 404, for me this one works: https://www.wsj.com/tech/cybersecurity/u-s-wiretap-systems-targeted-in-china-linked-hack-327fc63b
Or archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20241008022534/https://www.wsj.com/tech/cybersecurity/u-s-wiretap-systems-targeted-in-china-linked-hack-327fc63b
Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
I think you should watch this Great Video by CCC,de on Intel ME it has some great facts and information on the deal with IntelME without all the fearmongering and conspiracy theories other videos and blogs usually pump out.
aluminium@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 1y
Can't buy Huawei Networking gear, if we get hacked it has the be through our own backdoor.
Laberpferd@sueden.social · 2 pts · 1y
@db0 works as intended
Korkki@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
nice, that'll tech them.