It is bad. We have a society of laws and justice that's supposed to prevent the need for vigilantism. That system has broken down and favors people of wealth, and thus you have a return of vigilantes being seen as heroes.
vigilante justice is bad because you are enforcing a personal rule of law. the uhc ceo was enforcing many of his own rules through the company's own treatment of claims and its effects on governing entities. there was no justice, simply a warning that noone is less mortal than the people they commodify.
8 Comments
abbotsbury@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y
an unrelated image from a movie I saw once and would recommend
AVincentInSpace@pawb.social · 6 pts · 1y
"vigilante justice is bad" and "no one has the right to decide who lives and who dies" mfs the second vigilante justice happens:
ITT: "vigilante justice is bad and i can no way condone it" wink
Hildegarde@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 1y
vigilante justice is the only justice when the worst crimes are legal
frezik@midwest.social · 5 pts · 1y
It is bad. We have a society of laws and justice that's supposed to prevent the need for vigilantism. That system has broken down and favors people of wealth, and thus you have a return of vigilantes being seen as heroes.
pkill@programming.dev · 4 pts · 1y
trolley problem
the_best_nerd@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 1y
vigilante justice is bad because you are enforcing a personal rule of law. the uhc ceo was enforcing many of his own rules through the company's own treatment of claims and its effects on governing entities. there was no justice, simply a warning that noone is less mortal than the people they commodify.
TheFriar@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 1y
Let’s talk about it.
mwproductions@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Weekend?