Yeah, took me a couple tries. I thought mods were stopping "fuel extremism," so like maybe people were talking about intentionally wasting gas or something, and mods were telling users to cut it out.
I got there, but it was a bit of word-salad at first.
Nah, downvoted because it doesn't spark healthy discussion.
"What about freedom of speech?" isn't a valid question because the article is about social media, not a government. There are no freedom of speech rights on social media platforms.
8 Comments
11111one11111@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
That title reads like a drunkin Facebook post by someone's 80 year old aunt.
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1y
Yeah, took me a couple tries. I thought mods were stopping "fuel extremism," so like maybe people were talking about intentionally wasting gas or something, and mods were telling users to cut it out.
I got there, but it was a bit of word-salad at first.
i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world · -14 pts · 1y
which side left or right?
also
what about freedom of speech?
thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Most of those moderation just step in the moment the lie enters the chat.
And no, you freedom of speech does not allow you to lie without facing the consecuences
Isoprenoid@programming.dev · 0 pts · 1y
Both sides, because both have extremist ideologies.
Freedom of speech is a government thing, this article is about organisations. It doesn't apply.
Live_Let_Live@lemmy.world · -26 pts · 1y
wow downvoted for asking question so much for tolerant left
Isoprenoid@programming.dev · 14 pts · 1y
Nah, downvoted because it doesn't spark healthy discussion.
"What about freedom of speech?" isn't a valid question because the article is about social media, not a government. There are no freedom of speech rights on social media platforms.
LordKitsuna@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
You expect Americans to actually understand anything about their own bill of rights? Seems unreasonable given how uneducated they are