c/technology · by Generative@aussie.zone · 3yWhat problems are the AT protocol trying to solve that are not already solved by ActivityPub? 38 points · 6 comments · view on lemmy.world
6 Comments
sickmatter@infosec.pub · 15 pts · 3y
Repurposing random shit from the cryptocoin world since those projects mostly failed, and by god will they find a use for these things.
SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net · 14 pts · 3y
A creepy looking billionaire isn't totally in charge of ActivityPub and can't get more power out of politicians by lending favors to them using it.
jet@hackertalks.com · 2 pts · 3y
And that's a prohlem!
fraydabson@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 3y
I feel this explains it well - https://atproto.com/guides/faq
steve228uk@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 3y
I have still never bought this reasoning. A far better approach would be to propose an ActivityPub 2.0 as an RFC.
Mereo@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 3y
In my opinion, as long as it is not an RFC, it will go nowhere.