This is why I have tried to drill into junior devs that it is important to take a step back for several minutes before responding to criticism. It's just too easy to fall into the trap of interpreting comments and suggestions on improvement as a personal attack.
Probably, though the artist appeared to draw η (eta) rather than n which could mean they’re using learning rate to compute the bounds of some other value. I’m more curious what y-base log they’re taking and why.
It’s almost like it’s just supposed to look mathy or something.
9 Comments
_NetNomad@fedia.io · 35 pts · 1y
stack overflow
TimelordTraveler@lemmy.today · 30 pts · 1y
You joke, but I've actually encountered many people this standoffish about their designs in my career.
FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 1y
Yea this is quite common. People are still humans
NoDignity@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
This is why I have tried to drill into junior devs that it is important to take a step back for several minutes before responding to criticism. It's just too easy to fall into the trap of interpreting comments and suggestions on improvement as a personal attack.
zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 23 pts · 1y
Yeah, I got a problem with n^{logn}, wtf is that monstrosity??
drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 20 pts · 1y
Apparently that's quasi polynomial time, which grows faster than polynomial time but not quite as fast as exponential time.
Septimaeus@infosec.pub · 6 pts · 1y
Probably, though the artist appeared to draw η (eta) rather than n which could mean they’re using learning rate to compute the bounds of some other value. I’m more curious what y-base log they’re taking and why.
It’s almost like it’s just supposed to look mathy or something.
lowleveldata@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 1y
You got a problem for your algorithm, professor?
Septimaeus@infosec.pub · 4 pts · 1y
Ah, the theory group. My people.