Remember

365 points · 9 comments · view on lemmy.world

9 Comments

DaddleDew@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1y

And also the overcharged customers, who are in majority the working class. It's a double whammy.

SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 1y (1 reply)
[ removed ]
EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space · 9 pts · 1y

Your first sentence suggests you only have a loose understanding as profit is revenue beyond all expenses including wages, rd, and reinvestment.

It's a pedantic but important difference as businesses regularly take on debt required to generate capital. Profit is also taxable while rd and infrastructure is usually deductible.

ImWaitingForRetcons@lemm.ee · 8 pts · 1y (3 replies)

I think profits are fine, as long as every company is strictly a worker owned co-op.

Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 1y

Even if those profits are distributed as shares to the employees. Those who put in the most effort end up with the smallest share.

antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 1y

I worked for an “employee owned” corporation. It’s more of a tax shelter than an equitable model. The problem is they gift the executives so much stock that the amount any employee has is laughable.

Cowbee@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 1y

Worker coops are certainly less exploitative than standard businesses, but compared to public ownership and coordination retains a lot of the limits of market-based systems. I think cooperatives can serve as a good section of a growing and developing economy, but in all likelihood will need to be phased out as competition dies out and public planning becomes more efficient.

jagged_circle@feddit.nl · 4 pts · 1y

Abolish the wage system

Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 1y

Legal pyramid scheme with at least half the country having delusions of some day being the profiteer.

Kecessa@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1y

And the products on which the profit margins are too high.