If you had to be famous for one thing, what would it be?

34 points · 20 comments · view on lemmy.world

20 Comments

jeena@jemmy.jeena.net · 16 pts · 2y (2 replies)

For using the cross-post functionality in lemmy so that my posts would only show up once in peoples feeds ๐Ÿ˜„

nei7jc@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Is that a feature on jerboa?

jeena@jemmy.jeena.net · 1 pts · 2y

no idea

299792458c137@lemmy.sdf.org · 11 pts · 2y

solving any of the millenium prize problems.

funkless@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y (1 reply)

From writing a single song that 90% of people love and then immediately retiring

tun@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

Baby shark or Happy Birthday?

waterbogan@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y

Doing something that saved a bunch of lives (or at least one) or prevented a lot of misery. I really dont want to be famous but if I have to be I would want it to be for something really beneficial to humanity

SpunkyBarnes@geddit.social · 6 pts · 2y

Ridding the worldโ€™s oceans of plastic.

Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 2y

Some scientific breakthru or something that still wouldn't make anyone recognize me on the streets

Mesanne@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y

Largest Euro-Millions lottery win ๐Ÿ˜€

ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 2y

Queer advocacy

TheInsane42@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y (5 replies)

Humans finally realizing that they are part of nature/biodiversity like all other species on Earth, instead of 'above nature'.

I doubt it'll happen, ever, even though they are working hard to get themselves extinct.

ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y (4 replies)

I believe it asks "if You had to be famous for something"...

TheInsane42@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Then I'd say, nothing. Why would you want to be famous and be bothered by people everywhere you go?

ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y (2 replies)

You don't have to say something technically... But I agree.

Also, I was just thinking about this the other day...

If I want to leave a legacy, something to remember me by... Isn't that the same as wanting to be famous? Except, for after I'm dead.

Sure, the difference would be whether or not I'd want to monetize that legacy or fame... in a certain sense. Idk.

TheInsane42@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Not only if you can monetize it or not (I always had the mode 'when I can afford to live the life I have, I have enough'), but if you have your peace and quiet now or not. For some the American dream (work hard, get rich and famous) is great, for most (including those that work themselves to near death to be able to eat) not so great. (or even a nightmare)

Personally I'd rather have a legacy then be famous. (or just be left alone with my wife, pets and hobbies)

ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

That's the ideal solution.

Have a legacy, and live life.

gussybussy@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

Famous for being not famous

beefbaby182@lemmy.thesanewriter.com · 1 pts · 2y

All Star catcher in an amateur baseball league.

Ringmasterincestuous@aussie.zone · 0 pts · 2y

Circle jerking