How else are we supposed to give nearly half of the discretionary spending to defense contractors? We can't just make a big pile of all the bombs, that would be dangerous. Dropping them on poor people ensures they are only dangerous for a brief amount of time, with minimal risk to the ruling class.
6 Comments
ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml · 24 pts · 1y
Sounds like every policy of the war on terror.
bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net · 18 pts · 1y
wellfill@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 1y
CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net · 13 pts · 1y
How else are we supposed to give nearly half of the discretionary spending to defense contractors? We can't just make a big pile of all the bombs, that would be dangerous. Dropping them on poor people ensures they are only dangerous for a brief amount of time, with minimal risk to the ruling class.
teri@discuss.tchncs.de · 11 pts · 1y
And it costs innocent people their lives or makes it at least very miserable. Yeah, what to spend billions for...
reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 1y
The "anti war" president.
HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 1y
"Is this just an excuse to funnel public money into private military contracts?"
"Ye man"