Saw a TikTok on the Saturn ad that posed how inefficient car transport is when scaled with large populations. Basically, if you remove the body of the car and have people walk on those same roads, they are just taking up so much space. Traffic is horrible even though there is plenty of space between people. The comments section lacks media literacy in the most basic sense. Either they were willfully ignorant, or just outright stupid.
All the comments were like "doesn't this prove cars are the most efficient form of transport?"
Americans truly need to visit Tokyo, or really any city outside the US that HAS ACTUAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE.
I live in Houston, the worst possible car centric nightmare and I get nearly killed every other day. It's gotten to the point where you don't even flinch when someone almost rams you in a head on because these near misses happen all the time.
one trys to criminalize my friends, the other provides a more reliable form of transportation to the big airport than the smaller airlines and results in fewer deaths than firearms in my country.
âŚcriminalize your friends? Thatâs such a funny victim complex thing to say. Buddy I drive a fucking sportscar(when I drive at all) and I donât ever feel âcriminalizedâ, even when the local main street becomes pedestrian in the summer(it should be year-round). There are some places that have banned certain types of cars from their downtown cores but for the most part no one is criminalizing cars. What they are doing is pointing out how every single piece of evidence ever gathered reinforces that robust public transit is the best way in urban or semi-urban environments and that even rural communities could be tighter and more walkable.
Also if cars are resulting in fewer deaths than firearms Iâm shocked about how bad the firearm problem must be where youâre from(or wondering how many people actually have access to cars).
'murican republican party is trying to criminalize immigrants, LGBT youth, and pro palatinian speech; I have yet to see a car discriminate who it maimes or kills. IIRC there are plans for California to make new ICE cars illegal in 2035. and yes the us does have a bit of a gun problem.
What the fuck are you talking about? This is community aimed at improving public transit infrastructure and getting cities, especially North American ones, off of car dependency. Your comments are written like youâre trying to fight against what this community(and all the science) says and are now going off about entirely unrelated things without really explaining, in any sort of detail, this tenuous link your mind has created. You even said that cars provide a better transportation service to airports than small airlines do(???) and thatâs just completely off the rails to the point I canât even guess at what you might mean with any level of confidence.
Iâd love to figure out what the fuck is going on with you and this seemingly backwards, condtradictory opinion, so next time you reply can you just start over from the top and please take your time, thereâs no rush.
people destroy the environment, cars need people to cause significant environmental harm. If you just reduce the commonality (people) there will be less environmental harm, fewer deaths, and fewer cities pushing their employment heavy ideals on the rest of the country.
I was shooting heroin and reading âThe Fountainheadâ in the front seat of my privately owned police cruiser when a call came in. I put a quarter in the radio to activate it. It was the chief.
âBad news, detective. We got a situation.â
âWhat? Is the mayor trying to ban trans fats again?â
âWorse. Somebody just stole four hundred and forty-seven million dollarsâ worth of bitcoins.â
The heroin needle practically fell out of my arm. âWhat kind of monster would do something like that? Bitcoins are the ultimate currency: virtual, anonymous, stateless. They represent true economic freedom, not subject to arbitrary manipulation by any government. Do we have any leads?â
âNot yet. But mark my words: weâre going to figure out who did this and weâre going to take them down ⌠provided someone pays us a fair market rate to do so.â
âEasy, chief,â I said. âAny rate the market offers is, by definition, fair.â
He laughed. âThatâs why youâre the best I got, Lisowski. Now you get out there and find those bitcoins.â
âDonât worry,â I said. âIâm on it.â
I put a quarter in the siren. Ten minutes later, I was on the scene. It was a normal office building, strangled on all sides by public sidewalks. I hopped over them and went inside.
âHome Depot⢠Presents the Police!ÂŽâ I said, flashing my badge and my gun and a small picture of Ron Paul. âNobody move unless you want to!â They didnât.
âNow, which one of you punks is going to pay me to investigate this crime?â No one spoke up.
âCome on,â I said. âDonât you all understand that the protection of private property is the foundation of all personal liberty?â
It didnât seem like they did.
âSeriously, guys. Without a strong economic motivator, Iâm just going to stand here and not solve this case. Cash is fine, but I prefer being paid in gold bullion or autographed Penn Jillette posters.â
Nothing. These people were stonewalling me. It almost seemed like they didnât care that a fortune in computer money invented to buy drugs was missing.
I figured I could wait them out. I lit several cigarettes indoors. A pregnant lady coughed, and I told her that secondhand smoke is a myth. Just then, a man in glasses made a break for it.
âSubway⢠Eat Fresh and Freeze, Scumbag!ÂŽâ I yelled.
Too late. He was already out the front door. I went after him.
âStop right there!â I yelled as I ran. He was faster than me because I always try to avoid stepping on public sidewalks. Our country needs a private-sidewalk voucher system, but, thanks to the incestuous interplay between our corrupt federal government and the public-sidewalk lobby, it will never happen.
I was losing him. âListen, Iâll pay you to stop!â I yelled. âWhat would you consider an appropriate price point for stopping? Iâll offer you a thirteenth of an ounce of gold and a gently worn âBob Barr â08â extra-large long-sleeved menâs T-shirt!â
He turned. In his hand was a revolver that the Constitution said he had every right to own. He fired at me and missed. I pulled my own gun, put a quarter in it, and fired back. The bullet lodged in a U.S.P.S. mailbox less than a foot from his head. I shot the mailbox again, on purpose.
âAll right, all right!â the man yelled, throwing down his weapon. âI give up, cop! I confess: I took the bitcoins.â
âWhyâd you do it?â I asked, as I slapped a pair of Oikos⢠Greek Yogurt Presents HandcuffsÂŽ on the guy.
âBecause I was afraid.â
âAfraid?â
âAfraid of an economic future free from the pernicious meddling of central bankers,â he said. âIâm a central banker.â
I wanted to coldcock the guy. Years ago, a central banker killed my partner. Instead, I shook my head.
âLet this be a message to all your central-banker friends out on the street,â I said. âNo matter how many bitcoins you steal, youâll never take away the dream of an open society based on the principles of personal and economic freedom.â
He nodded, because he knew I was right. Then he swiped his credit card to pay me for arresting him.
Reminds me of an article I read today:
On german Autobahn there are cool signs here and there about the region e.g. beautiful landmarks.
These signs used to cost 3000-4000âŹ, but since Andreas Scheuer (think about him like a bitch for corporations) privatized the facility responsible for them, the cost has risen to 70000⏠per sign and know it seems like they are getting abandoned.
I was looking for this. This meme is not the own the author thinks it is. The people who follow this absolutely want to privatize that government road.
Watched the intro, I imagine the rest, if your comment offers related context, is motorists getting mad about being essentially directly taxed?
âWhy should I pay for trains I donât use?!â
âWhy should I pay for roads in your car-only neighbourhoods that I donât use? Also the trains get more cars off the road and lessen traffic for those who actually do need to drive so it is helpful to you.â
A lot of people dont seem to realize, a road is living infrastructure. It needs to be maintained in order to stay usable. You dont build a road and it just stays there forever. Its a service, not a one time purchase. Modern societies rely on this service to keep them running. Its not freedom to go anywhere without big government dictating where you can go. Its a specific, constantly updating and repairing living network - all controlled by the government.
Train tracks are the same, they just fill a more specific role. And AFAIK, here at least, if you buy a train, you can ride the rails too. A transportation engineer told me once, if more people bought trains, the government would be forced to lay down more track. Its a funny thought but in that sense, roads and train tracks both ultimately serve the people.
Two hours, one-way to work is patriotic! What's good for the oil industry is good for Murka. Besides, Frank Freeway has to show his manhood by driving a giant truck that he doesn't need.
May you ride eternal, shiny and chrome. I solved that shit by moving somewhere with trains, but you're on the money. My last car didn't even have power windows.
Where I live itâs every half hour, tops, and it takes ten times as long as driving and I have to walk next to a stroad the whole way.
But the real reason this was my first thought is I was run over by a school bus I was running to catch in kindergarten and now any form of scheduled transportation fills me with anxiety.
Then it should be every ten minutes instead of half hour...
Idk what to tell you, man, but "my local public transport isn't effective" is an argument against ineffective public transport, not an argument against the general concept
Right but even if it was effective I wonât like it. Because Iâd be ten minutes late everywhere from missing my train or an hour early because I didnât want to miss my train and avoid delays and cancellations.
So you have a deeply specific personal issue that youâre desperate to make everyone elseâs problem? Also buddy you donât want to look up car death and injury statistics is safety is your concern.
52 Comments
Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 103 pts · 1y
gndagreborn@lemmy.world · 53 pts · 1y
Saw a TikTok on the Saturn ad that posed how inefficient car transport is when scaled with large populations. Basically, if you remove the body of the car and have people walk on those same roads, they are just taking up so much space. Traffic is horrible even though there is plenty of space between people. The comments section lacks media literacy in the most basic sense. Either they were willfully ignorant, or just outright stupid.
All the comments were like "doesn't this prove cars are the most efficient form of transport?"
Americans truly need to visit Tokyo, or really any city outside the US that HAS ACTUAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE.
I live in Houston, the worst possible car centric nightmare and I get nearly killed every other day. It's gotten to the point where you don't even flinch when someone almost rams you in a head on because these near misses happen all the time.
I am so fucking sick of cars.
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -20 pts · 1y
sounds like large populations are the problem for cars, not cars being inherently a problem.
Evkob@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 1y
Great take, we should take all the humans out of cities to make them even more car-friendly!
It worked for Radiator Springs!
gndagreborn@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 1y
đ
DSTGU@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 1y
"It is impossible to fix that" ~citizens of the only country where it happens
Classic
irmoz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
Do you love cars more than people or something?
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -7 pts · 1y
one trys to criminalize my friends, the other provides a more reliable form of transportation to the big airport than the smaller airlines and results in fewer deaths than firearms in my country.
Soup@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
âŚcriminalize your friends? Thatâs such a funny victim complex thing to say. Buddy I drive a fucking sportscar(when I drive at all) and I donât ever feel âcriminalizedâ, even when the local main street becomes pedestrian in the summer(it should be year-round). There are some places that have banned certain types of cars from their downtown cores but for the most part no one is criminalizing cars. What they are doing is pointing out how every single piece of evidence ever gathered reinforces that robust public transit is the best way in urban or semi-urban environments and that even rural communities could be tighter and more walkable.
Also if cars are resulting in fewer deaths than firearms Iâm shocked about how bad the firearm problem must be where youâre from(or wondering how many people actually have access to cars).
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -3 pts · 1y
'murican republican party is trying to criminalize immigrants, LGBT youth, and pro palatinian speech; I have yet to see a car discriminate who it maimes or kills. IIRC there are plans for California to make new ICE cars illegal in 2035. and yes the us does have a bit of a gun problem.
Soup@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
What the fuck are you talking about? This is community aimed at improving public transit infrastructure and getting cities, especially North American ones, off of car dependency. Your comments are written like youâre trying to fight against what this community(and all the science) says and are now going off about entirely unrelated things without really explaining, in any sort of detail, this tenuous link your mind has created. You even said that cars provide a better transportation service to airports than small airlines do(???) and thatâs just completely off the rails to the point I canât even guess at what you might mean with any level of confidence.
Iâd love to figure out what the fuck is going on with you and this seemingly backwards, condtradictory opinion, so next time you reply can you just start over from the top and please take your time, thereâs no rush.
irmoz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
False comparison, terrible argument. People also legalise cars and build roads. Try again: why would you prefer fewer people to fewer cars?
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -3 pts · 1y
people destroy the environment, cars need people to cause significant environmental harm. If you just reduce the commonality (people) there will be less environmental harm, fewer deaths, and fewer cities pushing their employment heavy ideals on the rest of the country.
irmoz@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Reducing the population won't lead to fewer deaths. The very act of doing so would itself be death on an untold scale.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
I like to model my problem solving with human needs as the goals and machines as tools to achieve that. The inverse you propose sounds awful
Witchfire@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
I don't know if you realize that you live in a society of humans, nor cars
Mavytan@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 1y
That's an interesting way to phrase that. But indeed, cars and high population densities do not combine well.
tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de · 39 pts · 1y
And the whining when motorists actually have to pay for some of the roads they use is unreal: https://youtube.com/watch?v=I02i-ddf4Ro
MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 20 pts · 1y
The government should just call them freedom roads and say letting people use it for free would be socialism
SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee · 21 pts · 1y
I've known libertarians who were in favor of privatizing the infrastructure. They may get their wish.
frank@sopuli.xyz · 21 pts · 1y
j5906@feddit.org · 9 pts · 1y
Reminds me of an article I read today: On german Autobahn there are cool signs here and there about the region e.g. beautiful landmarks. These signs used to cost 3000-4000âŹ, but since Andreas Scheuer (think about him like a bitch for corporations) privatized the facility responsible for them, the cost has risen to 70000⏠per sign and know it seems like they are getting abandoned.
InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
It always comes down to the Austrian School. One of the worst things ever.
Zexks@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
I was looking for this. This meme is not the own the author thinks it is. The people who follow this absolutely want to privatize that government road.
Soup@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Watched the intro, I imagine the rest, if your comment offers related context, is motorists getting mad about being essentially directly taxed?
âWhy should I pay for trains I donât use?!â
âWhy should I pay for roads in your car-only neighbourhoods that I donât use? Also the trains get more cars off the road and lessen traffic for those who actually do need to drive so it is helpful to you.â
âStop I wanna be mad at public transit!â
Bytemeister@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
I'll say it.
My city life would be better if everyone else took trains and busses, but I still get to drive my car everywhere.
Soup@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
You write that like youâre being brave for saying one of the lamest, most self-centred take possible in such a short sentence.
PieMePlenty@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 1y
A lot of people dont seem to realize, a road is living infrastructure. It needs to be maintained in order to stay usable. You dont build a road and it just stays there forever. Its a service, not a one time purchase. Modern societies rely on this service to keep them running. Its not freedom to go anywhere without big government dictating where you can go. Its a specific, constantly updating and repairing living network - all controlled by the government.
Train tracks are the same, they just fill a more specific role. And AFAIK, here at least, if you buy a train, you can ride the rails too. A transportation engineer told me once, if more people bought trains, the government would be forced to lay down more track. Its a funny thought but in that sense, roads and train tracks both ultimately serve the people.
SippyCup@feddit.nl · 32 pts · 1y
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 1y
how much tax is there on train ownership overthere?
SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee · 20 pts · 1y
Two hours, one-way to work is patriotic! What's good for the oil industry is good for Murka. Besides, Frank Freeway has to show his manhood by driving a giant truck that he doesn't need.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · -15 pts · 1y
My car wonât ever drive off without me.
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 1y
This comment is gonna be so funny in ten years or less
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
I have a ten year old car and will be keeping it another ten years. It can't even shift without my help.
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
May you ride eternal, shiny and chrome. I solved that shit by moving somewhere with trains, but you're on the money. My last car didn't even have power windows.
synae@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 1y
Usernamedisplay name checks outirmoz@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
But even if it did, your car will never have an identical twin show up 10 minutes after, going the same way
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
Ten minutes?! Ha!
Where I live itâs every half hour, tops, and it takes ten times as long as driving and I have to walk next to a stroad the whole way.
But the real reason this was my first thought is I was run over by a school bus I was running to catch in kindergarten and now any form of scheduled transportation fills me with anxiety.
irmoz@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Then it should be every ten minutes instead of half hour...
Idk what to tell you, man, but "my local public transport isn't effective" is an argument against ineffective public transport, not an argument against the general concept
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 1y
Right but even if it was effective I wonât like it. Because Iâd be ten minutes late everywhere from missing my train or an hour early because I didnât want to miss my train and avoid delays and cancellations.
irmoz@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
"Even if it was effective, I might use it wrongly, or it might secretly be ineffective."
Listen to yourself.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 1y
Youâre right, my preference doesnât matter
Please forgive my individuality, everyone should be like you.
irmoz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
irmoz@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
Not really talking about preference or individuality here
Soup@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
So you have a deeply specific personal issue that youâre desperate to make everyone elseâs problem? Also buddy you donât want to look up car death and injury statistics is safety is your concern.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
Iâm not making you not take public transit. Iâm just going to be panicked the whole time.
Iâd honestly rather walk 20 miles than take a bus, or drive a thousand miles than take a plane.
Soup@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Ok, then what was your comment for?
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
To point out the reason I avoid scheduled transportation
And also because I needed downvotes
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Man, sounds like you need better public transport
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Living in a place dense enough for better public transit would kill me.
The suburbs are bad enough.
Donât worry, I donât want to come to your cities.
irmoz@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
I live in a very small town, all 2/3 storey buildings and fields everywhere
Still got buses that run every 10 minutes
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
That town is still too crowded and Iâd rather walk anyway