Because the safety of X [E-Bikes] has nothing at all to do with discussing the safety of Y [Deaths-from-cars] (I'm going to say this is "travel on public roads"), so small minded people will gawk at how large a number 99.5% is, without ever even stopping to ask if it's reasonable to compare those two things.
So, that's correct?
E-bikes are not the biggest threat to travelling on public roads.
And the article says this. There is a growing amount of people that would rather use a bike or e-bike than to drive.
4 Comments
9point6@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1y
I'm genuinely baffled it's not a several nines situation. I assume all road deaths involve cars
Xenny@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 1y
I bet it's the motorcycles skewing things a bit
ogmios@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 1y
towerful@programming.dev · 4 pts · 1y
Because cars are used more than bikes (electric or otherwise)?
ogmios@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 1y
towerful@programming.dev · 6 pts · 1y
So, that's correct?
E-bikes are not the biggest threat to travelling on public roads.
And the article says this. There is a growing amount of people that would rather use a bike or e-bike than to drive.
And cars cause most of the deaths.
Glad we agree