I mean, maybe if they had left Gadaffi use the army to quash his opponents, it would have kept Libya stable? I think that's what the dudes who wrote the article would have wanted.
It's funny that extremists dismiss MBFC but can't produce a single, credible alternative. It's like being fact checked triggers them but they know that any "fact checking" they try to do will also be fact checked further enraging them. Sorry I triggered you.
EDIT: OC made a salient argument that we can't counter. DOWNVOTE AND RUN AWAY!
7 Comments
rbesfe@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 3y
What a rag of an article, the Libyan civil war destabilized Libya not the NATO intervention
Gsus4@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 3y
I mean, maybe if they had left Gadaffi use the army to quash his opponents, it would have kept Libya stable? I think that's what the dudes who wrote the article would have wanted.
Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3y
Canada is an international resource extraction company fighting an politico-economic proxy war with China.
Everything seems congruent with that strategy.
MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 3y
Far left bordering on extreme left with mostly factual reporting.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/counterpunch/
Grimble@lemmy.ca · -6 pts · 3y
LMAO mediabiasfactcheck. If you still use that site you honestly deserve whatever incoherent political philosophy it gives you
Anything to say about the post's actual content?
DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 3y
What is your issue with the site? That it looks mostly at the source as a whole and not the specific story?
MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca · -3 pts · 3y
It's funny that extremists dismiss MBFC but can't produce a single, credible alternative. It's like being fact checked triggers them but they know that any "fact checking" they try to do will also be fact checked further enraging them. Sorry I triggered you.
EDIT: OC made a salient argument that we can't counter. DOWNVOTE AND RUN AWAY!