xkcd #3107: Weather Balloons

xkcd #3107: Weather Balloons

Title text:

Once you add the balloons into the model, it makes forecasting easier overall--the forecast is always 'cold and dark, with minimal solar-driven convection.'

Transcript:

[A graph is shown. The X axis is labeled Number of Weather Balloon Launches Per Day. It's logarithmic, with ticks in powers of 10, and values shown at 1, 10, 100, 1,000, 1 million, 1 billion, and 1 trillion. The Y axis is labeled Weather Model Accuracy, no values are shown. The plot starts above the mark for 1 balloon, at about 40% of the maximum value of the curve, it quickly rises through a point labelled "Current Rate", at about 4000 launches per day and 85% of the maximum. The maximum value is reached at 100 million, plateaus until 10 billion, and then reduces even more rapidly down to perhaps 15% maximum accuracy above the 10 trillion mark.]

Source: https://xkcd.com/3107/

explainxkcd for #3107

290 points · 18 comments · view on lemmy.world

18 Comments

Steve@communick.news · 22 pts · 1y

Seems like a climate change proposal to me 👍

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 1y (12 replies)

I'm going to need someone to adjust the model for instances in which an F-22 starts shooting them down.

ValiantDust@feddit.org · 13 pts · 1y (2 replies)

"Dabei war'n dort am Horizont
Nur 99 Luftballons."

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

The red ones go faster

Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 1y

dramatically removes sunshades
dear god.. the balloons are gay..

tate@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 1y (7 replies)

All the fighter jets in the world couldn't make a tiny dent in one trillion balloons.

Alexstarfire@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y (2 replies)

What about this?

tate@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

It looks like the dart took out about a half dozen lights and a dozen people in about two seconds, so let's say 10 strikes per second. At that rate it would take 10^11 seconds to pop a trillion balloons. That's more than 3000 years!

Of course I did say "make a tiny dent," but even to eliminate 0.1% of the balloons would take the dart 3 years. One trillion is a number that we use a lot, for example talking about the US national debt, but it is not an ordinary number that lends itself to intuitive understanding. Even a billion is hard to grasp intuitively.

Alexstarfire@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y

Let's just light the atmosphere on fire. Sounds like the quickest solution. Surely there can't be any downsides.

SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I'd just shoot doem down with FLAC cannons

ayyy@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 1y

Good idea using the Free Lossless Audio Codec that will sound way better than mp3 when the balloons all pop.

Deceptichum@quokk.au · 1 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
AmidFuror@fedia.io · 1 pts · 1y

We need more jets right away!

PodPerson@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 1y

How about when an unhinged person in the White House starts defunding NWS and launches get cancelled (yes - happening already).

EarMaster@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y (1 reply)

We launch over a thousand weather balloons per day?

Deebster@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 1y

It seems reasonable given that space the atmosphere is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is.

ksigley@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 1y

There really is an xkcd for everything.

NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 1y (1 reply)

My first thought was “who’s launching all these leather balloons?”.

Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 1y

kinky scientists