Sameer Samat, president of Android ecosystem at Google, asked a TechRadar journalist why they were using an Apple Watch, iPhone, and MacBook:
I asked because we’re going to be combining Chrome OS and Android into a single platform, and I am very interested in how people are using their laptops these days and what they’re getting done.
24 Comments
themeatbridge@lemmy.world · 75 pts · 1y
Closed ecosystems are one of the reasons I don't use an Apple Watch, iPhone, or MacBook. I know I'm not the typical target consumer, but I'm not that special. There are a lot of people who specifically avoid convergence.
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com · 8 pts · 1y
This one might be different. Many Chromebook owners mostly use Android Apps when not browsing in Chrome. Chromebook tablets are great, for instance, because they are basically Android tablets with full desktop Chrome (I still use FF, though).
Adding a full desktop browser to Android would realistically remove the need for ChromeOS, and be more efficient since it would remove the emulation requirement.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 56 pts · 1y
pls someone take android away from google before they ruin it even more.
mesamunefire@piefed.social · 31 pts · 1y
Oh god they are getting rid of adblock on Android too :D
whostosay@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 1y
Hopefully everyone can start dumping support into Linux for mobile
Turret3857@infosec.pub · 5 pts · 1y
I'm hoping for this too. All it takes is someone figuring out verified boot and encryption and I'm jumping ship. Could not care less about battery life or optimization, I am rarely far from a charger or portable battery.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 1y
Android is way better than any Linux device I've used. It is very solid security wise and has apps made for mobile. Mobile Linux feels clunky since the apps are typically ported from the desktop.
It would be better if there was a Android fork with lots of momentum and money.
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1y
msage@programming.dev · -1 pts · 1y
Manifest 3
DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 1y
baronvonj@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 1y
Apple doesn't exactly try to converge OS platform, even forking off iPad OS from iOS.
Microsoft's converged desktop and tablet OS hasn't been well regarded.
Google's efforts to make Android well suited on tablets has been poorly maintained.
I did find ChromeOS Flex on an old Surface Pro 3 to be a pretty good tablet experience. I'm cautiously optimistic about this, though I haven't tried the desktop mode on my Pixel 7.
skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de · 8 pts · 1y
baronvonj@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
Well iPad and iPhone did have the same OS at first, so they knew how to do that. I would have preferred when they forked iPad OS out for them to have converged desktop and iPad instead of making a 3rd distinct OS variant. I can't reasonably say that a docked iPad is the same as a Mac, as commercial apps I use have different versions, with different capabilities, for iPad and Mac. Things like Adobe Lightroom andIK Multimedia Amplitube. But my Surface Pro has one set of apps whether I'm docked at home, using a clamshell keyboard case, or as a tablet and pen. That's more useful to me than having a really well polished and dedicated tablet OS.
kalpol@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1y
Lineage works great on the Galaxy Tabs that support it
Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 1y
Considering Google's failure to support the tablet form factor on Android (many 1st party Google apps have much better versions for the iPad), I am skeptical this will lead to anything good.
eleitl@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 1y
Their ChromeOS tablets suck as well. The only reason for me to buy Google hardware is to put GrapheneOS on it.
Toribor@corndog.social · 5 pts · 1y
I miss the era around the release of Android 4 where there were all sorts of interesting 10" Android tablets coming out.
cron@feddit.org · 10 pts · 1y
It's sort of an open secret for years now. But I'm not totally convinced that it will work well.
I have a Chromebook with a Ryzen APU (Ryzen 3250 or smth). And while it handles all web tasks really well, it completely struggles with Android Apps. Even apps like "YouTube Kids" or "Prime Video" run far worse than their web couterparts.
And I'm not even talking about gaming - even old games like "cut the rope" run at unplayable framerates.
(my guess is that the whole virtualization framework is holding these apps back.)
woelkchen@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y
That's why future ChromeOS won't be a dedicated OS with an Android running in a VM. They'll be actual Android.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 1y
This is such a good business move
Android would really help to increase competition in the desktop space.
independantiste@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 1y
this is pretty good news, seeing ChromeOS supports Linux apps and is wayland-based now
Ulrich@feddit.org · 4 pts · 1y
I think this is precisely why they added Linux support to Android.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 1y
It would be nice if it way all unified so that Linux apps would run on any Android device.
eleitl@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 1y
Supports Linux apps poorly.
NickwithaC@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
"No shit."
Everyone who remembers that announcement that chromebooks would run android apps.
baronvonj@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
I'm thinking this is the opposite direction, with the enhanced desktop mode in Android 16. You hook your phone up to a KVM and get Chrome desktop, complete with containerized Linux apps and your mobile apps staying on your mobile device.
altphoto@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 1y
Which I will never use, thank you very much.