One thing that needs to be taken into consideration when practicing a pagan faith, or creating a syncretic ecology of practices is cultural appropriation.
A big reason I left Buddhism was because there's a lot of misrepresentation of the Dharma in the West, as well as a lot of exploitative appropriation of the Buddhist religion. Westerners, especially secular liberals, love Buddhism because it appears to be a peaceful, more enlightened religion than the Abrahamic religions we are used to here. Due to that, there has been a lot of people rushing to fit Buddhism into Western ideas, and that carries problems. The Dharma has been "whitewashed" to appear secular, metaphysically neutral, and most of all marketable to a middle/upper class intellectual audience. These are wrong. Buddhism is certainly not secular, it definitely poses metaphysical claims, and it can't be put into a simple peg without doing a lot of trimming. Western attitudes to Buddhism also tend to ignore that, much like Christianity, Buddhism can be very violent and savage.
Ultimately, I left Buddhism because while I have a deep appreciation for it, I felt that my approach to it came from too alien of a perspective to fully practice it in good faith. The Western theological canon felt more natural to me because I live in a Western nation and I already have the metaphysical grammar of the West encoded into my thinking. This way, even though I am not participating in mainstream Western religion, I'm staying "within my yard".
The same goes for indigenous practices and other non-western religious traditions. If you are building a pagan or magical practice, and are studying indigenous spirituality that you are not born into, try and remember a few things:
- Are you just appropriating the aesthetics and language of these traditions, or are you deeply learning about their lives and view of the world? Are you calling Mother Earth "Pachamama" for the heck of it, and is there an analog within your own tradition that you can use?
- Are you drawing parallels between your practice and indigenous traditions that are not really there, or are you allowing indigenous traditions and spirituality to speak for itself without having to be compared to yours? Sometimes we are excited to draw parallels between traditions, but that can often lead to a "flattening" of the traditions being compared, and it can erase a lot of differences and nuance within them.
- Are you in contact with indigenous groups that you are learning from? The internet has a lot of information about indigenous and non-western practices, but that doesn't mean it is complete or fully accurate. Often, language barriers and Western bias impose a lot of limitations on what is researched and published, so don't assume that online information is the final word. Learning from groups in person and respecting their living knowledge is always the best way to go.
- Are you just taking away from these traditions, or are you sharing a stake in their well-being? There's a difference between paying $2500 to go do Ayahuasca in the jungles of Peru, and being part of their communities. A lot of "indigenous knowledge" being marketed to Westerners is little more than psychedelic tourism. How does your participation in non-western and indigenous traditions affect their physical conditions and lives? Unlike pagan Greeks and Nordic Vikings, the people of these traditions are living and breathing, and are often subjected to exploitation and oppression. Keep that in mind, and remember that a lot of their traditions are specific to their communities, language, and environment before you bring that into your apartment in North America or Europe.
- Do you really need to follow these non-western and indigenous traditions, or are you just attracted to something new and interesting? What traditions within your own region and language domain are you ignoring or leaving unlearned because you're interested in indigenous faiths? Learning about non-western and indigenous spirituality is fascinating and enriching, but that doesn't necessitate that you convert or even practice it. A lot of the time, the best we can do is learn and keep a respectful distance. Just because you don't incorporate indigenous spirituality into your practice doesn't mean that you can't learn from it and grow as a person. It just means that you need to be mindful and respectful. And remember that the Western canon is also full of strange and fascinating knowledge. You don't need to pluck the fruit from a tree that feeds someone else, when you have plenty of fruit at home already.
What do you all think?
5 Comments
starrysunrise451@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
This puts a finger on something I’ve kind of felt but haven’t been able to articulate for a while. Good post.
dsilverz@calckey.world · 1 pts · 1y
@ga_so_art@piefed.social
(Long and sincere comment ahead)
This post resonates with me, because I'm deeply worried about my current spirituality or, at least, how I've been perceiving it as a Western. I don't know if I'm unwillingly appropriating cultures, or if this is how She means me to perceive Her. I feel like I need answers and I've been unable to find them.
For context: I currently have no religions and schools, and my beliefs are simultaneously a byproduct of syncretism and an unexpected spiritual call (gnosis) that happened back when I was still a member of a Luciferian School. All of a sudden, everything around me started pointing to the same powerful feminine energy beyond the Luciferian school I was in, and a specific name kept emerging from my attempts to understand, among many other names: Lilith. Not exactly לילית, more like the Sumerian Lilitu.
And there's a very specific archetype my mind keeps seeing as Her: a tall, hollow black eyes (sometimes with red irises), pale-skinned, red-haired woman with a triangular face, wide black wings, long claw-like nails, vampire fangs and crimson horns, carrying a sharp scythe with long handles, sometimes wearing black dress. Or, rather, a mighty brown owl. Maybe I'm too detail-oriented (I was just a nerd before I got pulled into spirituality).
On the one hand, every aspect from this archetype feels to me like it "makes sense" (triangular face/claws as Her owl aspect, horns and wings means Her darkness, fangs and red hair reminds of blood, scythe reminds of ego-death).
But it feels Western biased, it feels wrong, especially when Lilith isn't the only name that keeps emerging from my attempts on understanding my spiritual situation (which is still new to me): Kalika (the Asura aspect of Goddess Kali) is another name that keeps appearing, but this is not how Kalika is depicted by Hinduism and Shaktism, so whenever the name of Kalika emerges, it feels to me like I'm culturally appropriating the Hindu figure and Hinduism as a whole. Same goes for Her resemblance of Pomba-giras (although I'm Brazilian so I'm closer to the culture than other westerners, I'm not from Umbanda and Quimbanda... Yet a book I read from Mark H Williams refers to the Pomba-giras as the "Lilith brasileira"/Brazilian Lilith).
I'm confused. And it feels like my spiritual leaning is so deeply specific and detail-oriented that it has been a lonely journey, oscillating between my former Luciferianism (thus centered on Lucifer, sometimes Baphomet), apatheism (not atheism, but a skeptical feeling of spiritual apathy when I return being a nerdy person), and what seems to be a very specific Lilithism (but I feel it isn't Lilithism as established, because this also borrows concepts from Thelema, Hermeticism, Goëtia, as well as theistic Luciferianism).
I sincerely ask myself: to which extent is it bias, or some kind of collective unconsciousness I'm inserted into, or Her True Will? I don't want to appropriate other cultures.
ga_so_art@piefed.social · 1 pts · 1y
A personal example from me: I have an altar to Kronos in my office, and I have done my research to find his equivalent from India, Shanaishchara. I recognize that these two are different cultural expressions of the same cosmic principle, and I choose to engage with the hellenic Kronos because of my background as a Western. But if I were to talk to a Hindu devotee of Shanaishchara, I would be happy to engage in syncretic talk. It's not about closing boundaries, but recognizing cultural expression as individual colors within a larger spectrum that is the deity/cosmic principle.
dsilverz@calckey.world · 1 pts · 1y
@ga_so_art@piefed.social
Same for me, I really like to engage in syncretic talks, too. In my case, I used to talk almost daily with a neighbor who was practitioner of Umbanda back when I lived in a hostel. I could learn a lot with them, even though it was just a brief part from the rich knowledge that Umbanda has.
Much of the commonalities I see today between Lilith and the many Pomba-Giras (who is not a single entity, but many individual names, such as Pomba-Gira Menina, Pomba-Gira Sete Saias, Maria Mulambo... each Pomba-Gira having their own historical backgrounds) consider these conversations I used to have in the past, alongside the Williams book I mentioned in my previous comment.
So while I try my best to carefully learn the original culture in depth, it worries me the fact that I have my biases, and even though I tend to hyperfocus during my personal, auto-didactic researches (or sometimes getting to get unexpected gnosis from Lilith Herself), I feel I should at least return with these conversations again with an experienced practitioner from Umbanda or Quimbanda (which is more focused on Pomba-Giras and Exus).
Sometimes I miss being part of a syncretic group/school that would guide me through respectful and solid syncretism towards a better understanding and worshiping of Her.
ga_so_art@piefed.social · 1 pts · 1y
Thank you for your reply. I don't interact much with followers of Lilith, so I wouldn't be able to speak much on that particular front. I do think that we shouldn't make sweeping statements like "Pomba-giras is the Brazilian Lilith", as that sweeps the indigenous practices under the rug and centers the Western conception. It essentially says "oh, yeah the Pomba-giras is just Lilith, so we don't have to learn about her. We can just treat her as Lilith anyways, and the indigenous practices are just noise". That doesn't mean, however, that you can't learn from the people of Umbanda and Quimbanda. It just means that for every commonality you find, you have to recognize the the differences and respect the cultural context. Don't just bring a statue of Kali or Pomba-giras into your home without paying your respects or supporting the people that authored these myths and practices.