I honestly disagree which is why I downvoted your post. I can see NSFW "inflation" with tags sticked on pretty much anything these days. In my opinion NSFW tag should only be used for things genuinely "not suitable for work" - gore, porn etc. Otherwise it is misleading and losing its meaning.

Arkhive@piefed.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 357d (1 reply)

Yeah I’ve wrestled with this. Whenever I post I often get in my head trying to think of the “lowest common denominator” type user. One who will make a scene, or report, for things most of our user base would be fine with. Like I could see someone who doesn’t react well to autism being used in humor or something like that. Do I at all agree with that, no, not really, but as one of the mods I think of it like saving myself (mostly others because I’m often slow on the draw for checking reports tbh) potential future work. I’ll untag this tho. I think if I instead have someone complaining about being too heavy handed with the tag I can not worry about folks on the other end of that.

FelixCress@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 357d

Don't untag on my account, it is your post. At least you have good reasoning and I understand why you tagged it even if I wouldn't. I am removing the downvote now.

astropenguin5@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 358d (4 replies)

slut

FelixCress@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 358d (3 replies)

And?

festnt@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 357d (2 replies)

on

ICastFist@programming.dev · 2 pts · 357d (1 reply)

Quite a turn

festnt@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 357d

the

kyoko916@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 357d

real