Meta's AI rules permitted 'sensual' chats with kids until a journalist got ahold of the document and asked what was up with that
https://www.pcgamer.com/software/ai/metas-ai-rules-permitted-sensual-chats-with-kids-until-a-journalist-got-ahold-of-the-document-and-asked-what-was-up-with-that/
175 points · 10 comments · view on lemmy.world
10 Comments
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 37 pts · 1y
🤮
shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol · 25 pts · 1y
Meta: It's okay to sexualize 14 year olds.
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 1y
The sad thing is I'm not even surprised that Meta has that stance. A few years back, people were up in arms claiming there was a bunch of CSAM on Pornhub despite the site having robust systems to prevent it. Meanwhile there was orders of magnitude more CSAM on Facebook and Twitter that was ignored
bhamlin@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
Perception is key. People expect objectionable content where it already exists. To them this is only a matter of scale. "Facebook" is "family oriented" and as such couldn't possibly have that.
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 1y
13 is even okay *to them, not even in high school yet.
cannonship@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 1y
man, what the fuck is going on with people???
AntiBullyRanger@ani.social · 22 pts · 1y
Capitalism.
Undeterred capitalism.
cannonship@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
100% agree, and thanks to that, Meta probably won’t even face any real issues
tisktisk@piefed.social · 5 pts · 1y
The system is functioning exactly as planned--here's to hoping we can imagine something better soon ...not for our sake, but maybe our kids' kids
otter@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 1y
Some of these posts might be better for communities like !technology@lemmy.world, they're being reported in this community for not being PC Gaming related