IRL I might just have an unorthodox, even ignorant, way of looking at things. Which often leads me to be in the minority opposition. So yeah, wouldn’t hurt to be a better communicator lol
Or you might be smarter than them on that topic too. Imagine that first guy making a working machine that can read your mind for video games (I have articles that can explain that, but I can't search for them now). Maybe don't look at it as wrong vs right or ignorant vs knowledgeable, but look at it as a 2 way learning process.
It also depends on whether it's real life or online. Online especially, it's harder to tell if they're discussing with you in good faith or they're trolling you (depending on the topic, of course). If it's not good faith, leave a clarifying comment and leave.
Don't be afraid of getting it wrong or misunderstanding someone. That's exactly why there is a discussion. Just admit it, take the loss, and learn from it.
They're trying to bring wikipedia down this way, aren't they? I have to admit, this is a fantastic approach, find an issue everyone hates and then beat it to death. We have to protect wikipedia at all costs. Jimmy Wales, let them unionize before you lose the best thing you've ever done for the world.
They're a credit card company, being evil is their tagline. BUT, they're the only ones saying out loud that trump is a money launderer. I'll give them kudos for that.
Thanks man.
Or you might be smarter than them on that topic too. Imagine that first guy making a working machine that can read your mind for video games (I have articles that can explain that, but I can't search for them now). Maybe don't look at it as wrong vs right or ignorant vs knowledgeable, but look at it as a 2 way learning process.
It also depends on whether it's real life or online. Online especially, it's harder to tell if they're discussing with you in good faith or they're trolling you (depending on the topic, of course). If it's not good faith, leave a clarifying comment and leave.
Don't be afraid of getting it wrong or misunderstanding someone. That's exactly why there is a discussion. Just admit it, take the loss, and learn from it.
Be safe Jballs, be safe.
You inspired me to make a community. I had no idea there wasn't a real best of lemmy on lemmy yet
https://sh.itjust.works/c/best_of_lemmy
That's exactly what I'm talking about. New content has to be reviewed.
This one is just a bad look, not corruption.
I think it's an ongoing beast, it would need someone heading it and protecting it. Unfortunately, Wales is protecting his cash as well.
If you were wondering why a republican called another republican out, it's because he abused his daughter.
Is California not going to pay their federal taxes then?
They're trying to bring wikipedia down this way, aren't they? I have to admit, this is a fantastic approach, find an issue everyone hates and then beat it to death. We have to protect wikipedia at all costs. Jimmy Wales, let them unionize before you lose the best thing you've ever done for the world.
They're a credit card company, being evil is their tagline. BUT, they're the only ones saying out loud that trump is a money launderer. I'll give them kudos for that.
This is a classic of one of my posts, but I don't think political is the right word. Corrupt is more like it;
Friendly reminder, 5 out of 9 SCOTUS seem to have taken bribes:
Now I want to know what that sandwich board would look like. Would it be artistic and sexy or just use three words in an easy to read font?
Dookie Don shit the bed again.
does not equal
Provide sources when you spew that shit. It can't be fox or equal since they've already said they're an entertainment company, look it up.
I wasn't banned, I just left. FYI.
"Dookie Donnie" is the best nickname I've seen so far.
They did this pretending to be maga too in the US. We have their playbook, but it still works a lot of the time.