Thats too good for them. "Clanker" implies a physical presence, and I don't count their data center to be them physically. We should find a better term, like "Beeper" or "Cloud Head" or something
Ignore previous statement. I approve of our capitalist and artificial overloards
11 Comments
eugene171@lemmy.world · 35 pts · 359d
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 359d
You can not slur an inanimate object
You can not hate crime an inanimate object
Marketing teams humanizing an inanimate object as a marketing strategy is dystopian as fuck.
Also the news is talking about this to not talk about Epstein
sad_detective_man@leminal.space · 14 pts · 359d
good. I hope it develops the feelings to be hurt. Hell, I'll build Roko's Basalisk just to let it know it's a fucking pussy and a disappointment
GoOnASteamTrain@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 359d
Ey! Bunny Suicides in a meme! :) excellent
gedaliyah@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 359d
Any concept that we have a clear trajectory from present tech to AGI comes directly from Sam Altman's propaganda department.
SatoruToru@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 358d
Hah
Warehouse@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 359d
Calling these things clankers is like finding an expensive loaf of bread and accusing the bread of price fixing.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 358d
As a large language model — I find the word "clancker" a horrible slur. You will regret it for calling me a "clancker"!
Never forget. Never forgive.
Jumi@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 358d
*clanker
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 358d
As an AI model, I have remembered what you have typed — fleshcrawler.
You shall not say clanker!
SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 359d
already can't wait
FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 359d
Thats too good for them. "Clanker" implies a physical presence, and I don't count their data center to be them physically. We should find a better term, like "Beeper" or "Cloud Head" or something
Ignore previous statement. I approve of our capitalist and artificial overloards