I'm down for reducing plastic, but framing it around sperm and natalism just weirds me out. I get that we generally would like to continue as a species, but I sort of think the damage we've done to the earth requires cleaning up in and of itself, not so we can have more babies.
9 Comments
confusedpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 13 pts · 358d
Whenever I think about the movie Children of Men, all I can think is that the answer to the Human Project's question was microplastics.
Instead of asking why women couldn't have children anymore, they should have been checking men for forever confetti in their balls.
gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com · 8 pts · 358d
I'm down for reducing plastic, but framing it around sperm and natalism just weirds me out. I get that we generally would like to continue as a species, but I sort of think the damage we've done to the earth requires cleaning up in and of itself, not so we can have more babies.
crandlecan@mander.xyz · 4 pts · 358d
No, don't. The planet needs to heal, we can do with fewer people until we finally figure our shit out
crandlecan@mander.xyz · 6 pts · 358d
Sigh
INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone · 5 pts · 358d
Starting with this guys testicle.
Egonallanon@feddit.uk · -1 pts · 358d
Stop repeating eco fascist rhetoric.
furzegulo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 358d
If it saves me the cost of vasectomy, gimme more plastic
protist@mander.xyz · 8 pts · 358d
But there's also the cancer
Keyboard@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 358d
I don’t believe it