Do you think he'll respond?

456 points · 47 comments · view on lemmy.world

47 Comments

tkk13909@sopuli.xyz · 263 pts · 1y (5 replies)

So glad I can't see William Clarks name

TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 200 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Didn't wanna get in trouble; that's also why I cropped off the part that said "+13525199190"

outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 22 pts · 1y

If you keep being such a privacy respecting king, I'll build you a guillotine on reflex and have really complicated thoughts about making a facebook account.

DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works · 47 pts · 1y (2 replies)

All I see is ******* *****

cobysev@lemmy.world · 44 pts · 1y (1 reply)

hunter2

EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 1y

Thanks, I got back into my decades-old account.

No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org · 97 pts · 1y

Thank you for respecting William Clarks privacy

scottmeme@sh.itjust.works · 83 pts · 1y (4 replies)

Fully censored

Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 40 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I see nothing

proti@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 1y

the dude is probably wearing camo

Typhoon@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 1y (1 reply)

All I see is *******

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y

Just looks like
::: spoiler spoiler "Hunter2" ::: to me.

ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world · 54 pts · 1y

I'm in the EU. I can go to university and still live above poverty. Communist pigs, how could they do this to me?

SparroHawc@lemmy.zip · 48 pts · 1y (3 replies)

I'm just here to roast OP for their incredible job at censoring names.

TheMinister@sh.itjust.works · 31 pts · 1y

What do you mean? I can’t even read that it says William Clark

muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I like to think that was intentional.

explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 29 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Life hack: I told them I was a conscientious objector when I was 18 and never heard from them again.

I was this 🤏 close to joining ROTC and thought real hard if I'd be willing to kill random strangers in exchange for tuition. The debt was worth it.

Raiderkev@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y

I also almost joined. Graduated HS slightly after 9/11 and everyone had a huge boner for the military around that time. My buddy joined and referred me. I ultimately decided against it, and it was super annoying when I'd get random calls from recruiters the next like 5 years. They were very persistent. Glad I didn't join and have to go to Iraq / Afghanistan. I quite enjoy being alive.

icelimit@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 1y

Now you can tell random strangers that they owe you tuition and healthcare.

Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 28 pts · 1y (11 replies)

So, how do these scumbags even get your number?

TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 29 pts · 1y (1 reply)

My number is on my PsychologyToday page and my NPI profile, so hopefully from there, but I wouldn't be surprised if they bought it from the university I went to or got access to a government database associated with my license

helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1y

University is a lot more likely.

They like to prey on people desperate once the bills start rolling in.

Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 13 pts · 1y

Everyone and their brother that collects data for something will sell it to the highest bidders

TRBoom@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 1y (4 replies)

When I was signing up for the army in 2012 they asked me if I knew anyone who might wanna join, I think there was a bonus involved? Anyways I gave them no names or numbers and got nothing, not even the other bonus they promised me.

Never trust army recruiters.

Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Last one that reached out to me, I asked if I got to wear corporate sponsors of war on my greens like NASCAR does, and they didn't reply. :(

TRBoom@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 1y (1 reply)

It would just be General Dynamics repeatedly

outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y

That's not true. There's plenty of corporate citizens who support our wars!

not_that_guy05@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y

You never trust the recruiter and always read the contract twice.

So much for airborne school for me...

Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 1y

they own the telecoms and all tech companies..they literally have everything you do online documented and put into a profile about you.

medgremlin@midwest.social · 3 pts · 1y

The medical school application system, AMCAS, sells the information of every medical school applicant. I had to call the recruiters' office and explain to them that I have multiple failing organ systems and take more than 10 medications a day. I asked if they could get me a medical waiver for chronic kidney disease and they sheepishly agreed to remove my name from their list.

phdepressed@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 1y

Specifically for medical stuff, they swipe your number and email when you take the MCAT. I was debating an MD/PhD so I took it and even never applying or getting into med school they'd randomly email me, for like 5y after.

KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol · 22 pts · 1y (6 replies)

I'm curious, how does one manage to get labelled a terrorist??

TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 37 pts · 1y (4 replies)

Antifa :p

zqps@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 1y (2 replies)

How dare you hypothetically terrorize innocent fascists!

KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol · 5 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I'd move the word "hypotetically" a bit further, so that it says:

"How dare you terrorize hypotetically inocent fascists!"

There, now it's better and more accurate. Fuck them fascists. Not a single one is innocent

zqps@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1y

Exactly, none of them are innocent, so that part is just plain irony. "hypothetically terrorize" makes sense because simply identifying as anti-fascist can get you on terror watch lists these days.

YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 1y

We found the CEO guys! The Übwnwoken!

outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 1y

Fight terrorists. Say mean things about terrorists. Feed homeless people.

SkyezOpen@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1y

Those fuckers are desperate, so yeah probably.

Raiderkev@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Ladies and gentlemen, we got him

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_Clark

1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y

We did it, Lemmy!

Randelung@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y

"We can fix you ❤️"

umbrella@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works · -7 pts · 1y (3 replies)

Who*

"Whom" is an indirect object pronoun, not a direct object pronoun.

CandleTiger@programming.dev · 11 pts · 1y

Pronouns! Whom is correct here.

Who / whom works like He / him —

“The Trump administration attempted to label him a terrorist.”

“The Trump administration attempted to label whom a terrorist?”

He is the person whom the Trump administration attempted to label a terrorist.”

CandleTiger@programming.dev · 3 pts · 1y (1 reply)

On direct vs indirect object, I’ve heard that before but it doesn’t make sense. None of the other pronouns in English work that way.

Best supporting authority I could find in 15 seconds of looking was Merriam Webster.

dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 1y

You got me. I was taught incorrectly in high school. I always assumed it was the same thing as different pronouns in those particular cases for, as an example Spanish "se" vs "le". You've made me a better member of the alt write, formerly grammar nazis.