Seems like the downvote debate got another round on https://lemmy.zip/post/47242086/21088009 , so this could be useful
Casual reminder that Piefed allows to limit downvotes to people subscribed to a community
Seems like the downvote debate got another round on https://lemmy.zip/post/47242086/21088009 , so this could be useful
40 Comments
QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip · 28 pts · 359d
This beats mods banning people for downvoting. That shit was juvenile.
IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 358d
The amount of mental gymnastics to justify that shit was insane.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 13 pts · 359d
I made that request on Lemmy and they turned me down. I wonder how I could switch my instance to piefed.
My Taylor Swift community is actually doing quite well with each post getting about 15-20 up items, but it's completely hidden because of all the downvoted from people who don't like her. It hurts the community
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 359d
Unfortunately there isn't a straightforward way to do so at the moment, mostly because of how federation works.
What some instances have been doing is using a piefed subdomain, like https://piefed.blahaj.zone/
Maybe that could be an option for you?
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 4 pts · 359d
When I get some freetime I might set it up. My thought is if I can somehow move the community that's easy, but then for federation could I just "swap" it out to piefed and nobody would know? After all everything we do here is based on DNS, if DNS points to a new place, well who would know?
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 359d
There is a feature to migrate a community from Lemmy to Piefed. There are a few limitations, but it's not too bad overall
"Swapping" it without using that feature might break federation as it relies on asymmetric keys to sign activities
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 2 pts · 359d
ah damn, the keys would definitely break then, thanks for warning me about that - it's not worth the effort then for now. I was hoping if I just changed DNS that a downstream federated service would just see the update and start accepting new items.
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 359d
Happy to help. Feel free to subscribe to !piefed_meta@piefed.social or !piefed_help@piefed.social in the meantime, things are moving quite fast
Quokka@quokk.au · 3 pts · 358d
So my instance used to run Lemmy, I changed it all over to PieFed but kept the domain the same and recreated all the communities again. None of the content moved over - I was running out of HDD and needed to wipe anyway, other instances already had the old stuff cached so it looked the same on their end.
The only real headache I ever found was that PieFed doesn't (might be fixed?) support capitals in community names, so once recreated with a lowercase name those communities had a different ID on other Lemmy instances and would no longer federate. Oh and your subscriber numbers will forever look low, but the subbed people will stay subbed on their ends you just wont see it in the number.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech · 2 pts · 358d
Thanks that's essentially exactly what I was thinking of doing! Thanks for writing it all up. I'll take these and think on it
jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 359d
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 8 pts · 359d
Can you link it? I can't find it
Lemmy devs went on a spree of closing issues as "not planned", some of them sounded like good ideas to me, and some of them were actual bug reports which seems odd to close as "not planned"
Maybe we need to start saying "PieFed does this" in our feature requests lol
jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 359d
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 4 pts · 359d
That's not the same thing though. That's about local vs remote users. But the OP's post about PieFed's feature is for people subscribed (following) to the community vs not subscribed.
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 359d
Well spotted
jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 359d
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 358d
The objective is not to prevent organized brigading, but non community members downvoting from All
jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 358d
celeste@kbin.earth · 13 pts · 359d
I like this idea. Makes the thought of creating a community for niche, boring topics more appealing.
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 15 pts · 359d
Yeah sometimes a post from like !fishing hits the all feed and then some user decides they don't like fishing or it's boring and they downvote the post lol.
That's not what downvotes are supposed to be for, they should just block the entire community instead of trying to downvote every post from it.
Also it makes no sense to downvote for their own personal feelings because they already saw the post, the votes are for other people to benefit from.
erlend_sh@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 359d
Does that mean someone from another instance that’s running on Lemmy also wouldn’t be able to downvote?
(Love this feature!)
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de · 8 pts · 359d
My totally uneducated guess is that it works similarly to how instances with disabled downvotes work. The downvotes should work on the instances where they were issued. But they wouldn't federate to other instances.
Quokka@quokk.au · 2 pts · 358d
My instance has a few communities with subscriber only downvotes and that's the result I've seen.
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 359d
Good question, I haven't tested it to that extend yet.
@Snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.fr IIRC you enabled that for !fediverse@piefed.social , have you tried downvoting from Lemmy?
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 359d
Why would it mean that? Not following your logic.
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 359d
They're asking whether this works between a Piefed and Lemmy instance, or only between Piefed instances
glitchdx@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 359d
Does piefed have a means for categorizing my subs like reddit's multis? There's all kinds of content that I'd want to look into regularly, but I don't want on my main feed. I don't like being forced to have multiple accounts just to organize topics.
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 359d
It does, those are called feeds, and can be private or public. It's quite handy as you can guess
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com · 2 pts · 358d
Yep https://piefed.social/feeds
https://join.piefed.social/features/
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de · 3 pts · 359d
Oh, wow, I think I made that suggestion. Damn they're fast!
Edit: I think I didn't. I had a similar idea about comments. But I think I never got around to making a proper feature request.
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 359d
It has been around for a while, to be honest!
Skavau@piefed.social · 3 pts · 359d
Presumably this would only impact the upvote/downvotes within the instance though.
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 359d
Not sure, I never remember how it works for instances with disabled downvotes
Skavau@piefed.social · 4 pts · 359d
They don't see the downvotes, but other instances do
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 359d
FYI @cloudless@piefed.social
MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 359d
Neat.
SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 358d
Hurray for echo chambers! My favourite kind of chamber after that other kind
mugthol@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 358d
Trying to prevent brigading is not the same as creating an echo chamber
SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 358d
Hurray! Good intentions make the best pavement!
Blaze@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 358d
This community is for people trying to grow communities on the Fediverse.
You currently have 0 posts, so you probably never experienced systematic downvoting your content, making it invisible.
SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 358d
Oh, you sly cookie! Instead of replying to my point, you dug through my profile to look for ammunition to use on me! I love it. Please, accept this upvote readily.