clearly everyone in the comments immediately pegged this as ai. i did too, but i am not sure what it is specifically that makes this feel so obviously ai. anyone got any ideas what it is that we're all picking up on here?
It makes you wonder if they have a whole bunch of training data in this style, or if it is the mathematical average of all cartoon styles mashed together.
If it was a simple average it would have been mangled. This is a deliberate fine-tune of the model to the particular style. For fine-tuning you need some type of input, if generated or human made doesn't matter.
The reason why they fine-tuned to this particular style is unknown, but they might be:
To quickly and not as expensively produce and release a usable model in the then more heated, now slowing down competition for better and better models
To reduce the model size as there is no need for lots of data on multiple styles.
To give a distinct comics style to their model, so to make people associate the image to their model instead of OP
There is nothing wrong with fine-tuning, and it is very often necessary to have the output not be gibberish.
15 Comments
Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca · 64 pts · 362d
5PACEBAR@lemmy.world · 46 pts · 362d
AI garbage
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 35 pts · 361d
xia@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 361d
It was not immediately obvious from the image (though you might see the starfish for scale), but these things are huge!
hypnicjerk@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 362d
did you add 'coal ash' in ms paint because you couldn't get gepetto to label it
xia@lemmy.sdf.org · -14 pts · 362d
Are you suggesting I should have asked it to reprocess the image, or ask it to try again?
some_designer_dude@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 362d
You should have paused for a moment and questioned whether any of this was worth it.
hypnicjerk@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 361d
sometimes you measure twice and decide not to cut at all
BroBot9000@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 362d
Generating this slop only furthers the environmental damage ya numpty.
juliebean@lemmy.zip · 15 pts · 361d
clearly everyone in the comments immediately pegged this as ai. i did too, but i am not sure what it is specifically that makes this feel so obviously ai. anyone got any ideas what it is that we're all picking up on here?
SSUPII@sopuli.xyz · 14 pts · 361d
This is the art style that OpenAI forced its model to generate. Nobody else draws this way.
xia@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 361d
It makes you wonder if they have a whole bunch of training data in this style, or if it is the mathematical average of all cartoon styles mashed together.
SSUPII@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 361d
If it was a simple average it would have been mangled. This is a deliberate fine-tune of the model to the particular style. For fine-tuning you need some type of input, if generated or human made doesn't matter.
The reason why they fine-tuned to this particular style is unknown, but they might be:
There is nothing wrong with fine-tuning, and it is very often necessary to have the output not be gibberish.
fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 361d
It's the "fallout poster boy" kinda drawing style but the a different colour palette, it's openAI's signature style.
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 361d
The drawing style is very common in slop.
UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 361d
Step 1: Post slop
Step 2: Get blocked