Title text:
The draw-by-repetition rule does a good job of keeping players from sliding a tile back and forth repeatedly, but the tiles definitely introduce some weird en passant and castling edge cases.
Transcript:
Transcript will show once itโs been added to explainxkcd.com
Source: https://xkcd.com/3139/

25 Comments
forrcaho@lemmy.world · 65 pts · 353d
This could be a real thing: at each turn, you can either make a standard chess move, or slide one of the board tiles ... who wants to code it up?
missingno@fedia.io · 48 pts · 353d
I bet someone will have a playable version up within less than 24 hours.
Nougat@fedia.io · 17 pts · 353d
There would need to be two missing 2x2 board pieces for symmetry.
missingno@fedia.io · 20 pts · 353d
Chess is already asymmetric since white moves first, so it's not necessarily a problem for the starting position to also be asymmetric. Though I wonder which would be the best starting position for the empty square, on white's side or black's?
Nougat@fedia.io · 20 pts · 353d
I'd think that having an empty 2x2 right in front of any of your pieces would limit your options for moving pieces. So I would put it in front of White, not in the middle, but on one of the edges. Also, White would not be allowed to shift the tile on their first turn, since that would just put the disadvantage on Black, who would shift a tile, yada yada. Maybe ... maybe you would only be allowed to shift a tile if you didn't shift a tile on your previous turn.
Another thing - would Queens, Bishops, Rooks be able to "jump" the empty space to cross from one side of an empty 2x2? I'm thinking yes.
Agosagror@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 353d
I think the answer to that question will be clear once you play test it
You'd probably want both varients, though I suspect being able to block a queen attack by moving a tile would bring more tatically nuance.
Nougat@fedia.io · 4 pts · 353d
Wouldn't be hard to build a paper board and play on that.
Agosagror@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 353d
I'm going to put on together once I have time See how that goes, I don't have anyone to trial it against though but I'll put a Lemmy post up about it
Bubs@lemmy.zip · 18 pts · 353d
Maybe instead of starting with a hole, one player gets to choose which 2x2 to remove? It would have to be early on to ensure there is always a few empty 2x2s to choose from.
So maybe black chooses the 2x2 to remove and then white makes their first move. That way black gets a bit of an advantage since white moves first.
Rentlar@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 353d
If I were to make up the rules:
Did I forget to cover anything?
altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 353d
It ๐ needs ๐ more ๐ horsey ๐ shenanigans.
Rentlar@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 352d
The greatest minds of the Internet are assembling at !anarchychess@sopuli.xyz to create the best variant of this game.
Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 352d
I would say you can only move a tile if you have a piece on it as well.
Rhaedas@fedia.io · 13 pts · 353d
In some aspects this results in situations that the original Star Trek 3-D chess has with its movable platforms. The issue with chess variants is always how it adds while not unbalancing the game, and that's a difficult thing to test since chess by itself is complex even with its simple rules.
ameancow@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 353d
Feathercrown@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 353d
I played this once, it's great, would recommend
ameancow@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 353d
Feathercrown@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 353d
No way thats so cool
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 353d
That's an aspect to Star Trek's 3D chess, you can move the smaller platforms around in lieu of moving one of your pieces. I have no idea if it adds or subtracts from the game.
ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 353d
damn, i played a real one where the platforms didnโt moveโฆ they just kinda extended the board
Glifted@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 353d
This just makes me think of "5D chess with time travel"
xia@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 353d
So now that the black pawn has reached "the last rank", does it get promoted?
SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 352d
no, because it hasn't reached the 8th rank.
xia@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 351d
So even if it does not move, this pawn could get promoted by some future tile-slide... come to think of it, I guess two pawns could get promoted in the same turn via a tile-slide.
SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 351d
That does seem to be the case, yes. Although I expect your opponent wouldn't let you pull that off so easily.
xia@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 351d
SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 350d
A surprise, to be sure, but a welcome one