Genuine question, what was the last time Blizzard released an actually good game, much less a new good game? Because by my reckoning it was over a decade ago with Overwatch, and that leaves me with exactly zero expectation that anything they could make would be with the time to play it.
Maybe someone should invest in building a paid parking deck if it's sucg a problem, instead of relying on public infrastructure to support inefficient transportation.
The main point is that, in this case at least, it is measurably safer for cyclists to treat stop signs as yield signs even when that isn't what the law says.
Having a blind spot because it takes a moment to turn your head is way different from having a blind spot because there is a headrest and multiple metal pillars in the way at minimum. Also on a bike you can probably actually hear surrounding traffic, which helps a lot with spatial awareness.
About 15% of the US population lives in states with Idaho Stop laws, where bicyclists are allowed to treat stop signs as yield signs, and just under half of those also allow them to treat red lights as stop-then-yield signs. This has provided hard data indicating such a practice is measurably safer for cyclists, I believe at least partially because a disproportinate amount of collisions involving them happen in intersections and not needing to slow down for them means cyclists spend less time in those high danger zones. Given how much advice I was given as a driver boiled down to "drive safely, even if that means breaking the law" (especially given in regards to speed limits), I think it is perfectly justified for a biker to do the same, and act in the safer manner even if the laws says to do something else.
That's the actual term for it dumbass: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petro-masculinity
Genuine question, what was the last time Blizzard released an actually good game, much less a new good game? Because by my reckoning it was over a decade ago with Overwatch, and that leaves me with exactly zero expectation that anything they could make would be with the time to play it.
I don't see any contradiction, piracy is fine when it's just for personal use, not when you intend to use it to make money, directly or otherwise.
Why would driving the opposite direction to traffic cause you to hit more red lights?
I would love for actual gas rations to be implemented, maybe that would finally be enough to get people to actually bike places.
Firefox has that. Kinda has done for a while, but it recently became more visible.
Because corporations aren't pirating for personzl consumption, they are pirating to ingest huge amounts of data for commercial use.
The city now isn't allowed to use zoning restrictions to prevent more dense development from taking place in those locations.
Maybe someone should invest in building a paid parking deck if it's sucg a problem, instead of relying on public infrastructure to support inefficient transportation.
I'd take them more seriously if they could be bothered to spell "censoring" correctly.
"These terms are accepted"
It's a non sequitur is the problem, and seems to buy into the whole christian prosecution complex that's a huge problem in the US.
Unions are very effective at protecting members, 'tis unfortunate that police unions are the last really effective ones.
For some reason it's including the period at the end as part of the link, which breaks it.
For Phoenix that is quite cool.
The main point is that, in this case at least, it is measurably safer for cyclists to treat stop signs as yield signs even when that isn't what the law says.
Having a blind spot because it takes a moment to turn your head is way different from having a blind spot because there is a headrest and multiple metal pillars in the way at minimum. Also on a bike you can probably actually hear surrounding traffic, which helps a lot with spatial awareness.
About 15% of the US population lives in states with Idaho Stop laws, where bicyclists are allowed to treat stop signs as yield signs, and just under half of those also allow them to treat red lights as stop-then-yield signs. This has provided hard data indicating such a practice is measurably safer for cyclists, I believe at least partially because a disproportinate amount of collisions involving them happen in intersections and not needing to slow down for them means cyclists spend less time in those high danger zones. Given how much advice I was given as a driver boiled down to "drive safely, even if that means breaking the law" (especially given in regards to speed limits), I think it is perfectly justified for a biker to do the same, and act in the safer manner even if the laws says to do something else.
Too expensive unless you can predict exactly when the bubble is going to burst.
Ok fine then, another hotel.