And they are only answering the easy questions in that thread, just basically answering those "yes" answers with "but but but...you are wrong". When someone elaborates further or presents some good arguments they just stop answering.
I'm happy I moved to CoMaps when the shitty behaviour of OrganicMaps shareholders came into light.
I'm not a user. But in my opinion, it is more important to be seen as a small project than blindly following foss. Maintaining two repos is a lot of work.
I also use as much foss as possible, no facebook, etc. but if the added benefit is large enough, one should do it. I'd much rather have an osm app with a billion users on github than a thousand on codeberg.
6 Comments
LodeMike@lemmy.today · 34 pts · 338d
You should edit the post title to say "on GitHub" instead of whatever is currently going on there.
BrikoX@lemmy.zip · 29 pts · 338d
Just use CoMaps.
vatlark@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 337d
TIL CoMaps is on codeberg
MoreZombies@piefed.au · 11 pts · 337d
It looks like less of a call for actual feedback and more a call for positive reinforcement for their decision to be on there.
Lazycog@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 337d
And they are only answering the easy questions in that thread, just basically answering those "yes" answers with "but but but...you are wrong". When someone elaborates further or presents some good arguments they just stop answering.
I'm happy I moved to CoMaps when the shitty behaviour of OrganicMaps shareholders came into light.
illusionist@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 338d
I'm not a user. But in my opinion, it is more important to be seen as a small project than blindly following foss. Maintaining two repos is a lot of work.
I also use as much foss as possible, no facebook, etc. but if the added benefit is large enough, one should do it. I'd much rather have an osm app with a billion users on github than a thousand on codeberg.