The libs never cared about what he said; now they're in full-on hagiography mode. They're singing the new Horst-Wessel-Lied with their smelling salts close at hand
Also, they spread racism homophobia etc and say how it is free speech and how "hate speech is a free speech" but now they are suddenly against hate speech, at least my experience from tiktok.
You are correct. Nor am I under the illusion that posting memes online counts as activism. For all of our internet discussion, the only thing that really matters is what we do in the streets. (But I wouldn't post about those activities online.)
Yeah, but we still need to make sure nobody can say "I didn't know" 10, 15, 20 however many years down the line when it turns out that everyone was always against everything the right is currently doing.
If there are as many people as the right says who want to kill for beliefs, I have to assume you are dead now and won't be responding. If you are not dead, either you and the right are wrong about how many people are willing to kill for your beliefs, or you both are lying for some purpose.
26 Comments
magic_lobster_party@fedia.io · 63 pts · 345d
They were fine with the things Charlie Kirk said until he died. Now it’s suddenly not ok to remind everybody of all the things he said.
BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 345d
That would undermine their martyr and sainthood narrative. We can’t have that, can we?
lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works · -13 pts · 345d
The libs never cared about what he said; now they're in full-on hagiography mode. They're singing the new Horst-Wessel-Lied with their smelling salts close at hand
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 344d
Una@europe.pub · 39 pts · 345d
Also, they spread racism homophobia etc and say how it is free speech and how "hate speech is a free speech" but now they are suddenly against hate speech, at least my experience from tiktok.
Darkard@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 345d
While pointing out these things is fine. You know the MAGAs genuinely don't give a shit about it right?
You can tell them directly that they are two faced and they will just call you a slur.
balderdash9@lemmy.zip · 14 pts · 345d
You are correct. Nor am I under the illusion that posting memes online counts as activism. For all of our internet discussion, the only thing that really matters is what we do in the streets. (But I wouldn't post about those activities online.)
Frog@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 345d
You are correct. They actually enjoy it. That's how fascism works.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 344d
Yeah, but we still need to make sure nobody can say "I didn't know" 10, 15, 20 however many years down the line when it turns out that everyone was always against everything the right is currently doing.
Sunshine@piefed.social · 24 pts · 345d
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 344d
He was stochastic terror.
Jaysyn@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 344d
Live by the stochastic terrorism, die by the stochastic terrorism.
Darkard@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 345d
Lol at the 1 coward Magaloid down voting every comment
Noite_Etion@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 345d
Free speech for me, but not for thee /s
qevlarr@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 344d
When the right wing says free speech, they mean they want freedom to say whatever they want, and also the freedom for us to say whatever they want
IndridCold@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 344d
They just want to use racial slurs again without any backlash.
Flickerby@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 344d
Rules for thee, not for me.
aesthelete@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 344d
MAGA: I do not agree with what you're saying, and I'll defend your death for saying it
Hastur@sh.itjust.works · -9 pts · 345d
Hastur@sh.itjust.works · -12 pts · 345d
Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 345d
There is a conartist, rapist, kiddie diddler in the oval office. Supporting him is wrong.
Or
Following and supporting someone from the mainstream media who continuously espouses hate speech is wrong.
I guess I know where this will end but I'm open to be surprised.
Hastur@sh.itjust.works · -18 pts · 345d
Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 345d
You proved my point.
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 345d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex?wprov=sfla1
acchariya@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 345d
If there are as many people as the right says who want to kill for beliefs, I have to assume you are dead now and won't be responding. If you are not dead, either you and the right are wrong about how many people are willing to kill for your beliefs, or you both are lying for some purpose.
Hastur@sh.itjust.works · -7 pts · 345d
fosho@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 345d
what about murder in war? is all the murder in Gaza wrong?
Hastur@sh.itjust.works · -5 pts · 345d
fartemoji@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 345d
Sounds like a simple difference of opinion about gods if you ask me.
Hastur@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 345d
fartemoji@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 345d
Murder is ok if you're religious?
Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 345d
So capital punishment is wrong? Celebrating the death of Charles Manson is wrong? How about Hitler?
PagPag@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 345d
Hastur@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 345d