Google actively shooting themselves in the foot. Why would I choose an Android phone over an iPhone if Google continues to remove features and user freedoms that set it apart from apple's "walled garden"
I'm really hoping more adoption of Ubuntu Touch and other alternative mobile OSs will come from this, and with that, more support and development to make them feasible alternatives for the average user
This is actually why I ended up switching a couple years ago. I started when Android was balls-to-the-wall customization and there were tons of custom ROMs. You could theme all of Material UI and my phone looked nothing like when I first got it. By the time I left, you could get like one of 5 very expensive phones that had unlocked bootloaders and even those had very few ROMs.
Even with the custom ROMs, the joy was dead. You couldn’t wildly theme everything from the boot logo to the lock screen to the notification bar. It had been boiled down to pretty much the same set of customizations as the iPhone and the iPhone was more reliable. I didn’t want to switch, necessarily, but for my use cases as least, it just ended up being the easier choice.
I really wonder what their logic is here. I'm very excited to hear that GOS will be partnering with an OEM to hopefully get more support for the project, more frequent security updates, etc.
I'm on the take that they're working together with the US government to limit access to apps that can be useful and aren't government controlled and aren't riddles with spyware or would give consumers choice
If I had to guess, I would speculate that their motivation is a long-term play to squash the general perception that Android has more malware (and is therefor less secure) than iPhone. Just about every article I've seen to that effect includes (1) enable unknown sources, and (2) install this malware app; so they probably see the current hurdles as insufficient and intend to perma-ban dev accounts that they find signing malware apps.
Google is about to start requiring ID verification from developers to allow installation of their apps. "Unverified" apks will be blocked without GUI bypass.
Check "Google app developer verification", I don't have an article ready and my time is up.
17 Comments
OR3X@lemmy.world · 60 pts · 332d
Google actively shooting themselves in the foot. Why would I choose an Android phone over an iPhone if Google continues to remove features and user freedoms that set it apart from apple's "walled garden"
ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com · 26 pts · 332d
DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online · 20 pts · 332d
I'm really hoping more adoption of Ubuntu Touch and other alternative mobile OSs will come from this, and with that, more support and development to make them feasible alternatives for the average user
otacon239@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 332d
This is actually why I ended up switching a couple years ago. I started when Android was balls-to-the-wall customization and there were tons of custom ROMs. You could theme all of Material UI and my phone looked nothing like when I first got it. By the time I left, you could get like one of 5 very expensive phones that had unlocked bootloaders and even those had very few ROMs.
Even with the custom ROMs, the joy was dead. You couldn’t wildly theme everything from the boot logo to the lock screen to the notification bar. It had been boiled down to pretty much the same set of customizations as the iPhone and the iPhone was more reliable. I didn’t want to switch, necessarily, but for my use cases as least, it just ended up being the easier choice.
Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 332d
Unfortunately 99.9999999999999999999% of Android users don't care and won't even notice this happen
moseschrute@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 331d
99.999999% if Lemmy users hate iPhone but think Android is safe. The other 0.000001% use a Linux phone.
fin@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 331d
I'm willing to switch to Linux Phones if Waydroid works reasonably well
daggermoon@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 331d
I use Waydroid on desktop and it works well.
fin@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 330d
I know. I wonder it works well on my $40 Pixel 3a as well
root@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 331d
I really wonder what their logic is here. I'm very excited to hear that GOS will be partnering with an OEM to hopefully get more support for the project, more frequent security updates, etc.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 331d
I'm on the take that they're working together with the US government to limit access to apps that can be useful and aren't government controlled and aren't riddles with spyware or would give consumers choice
xia@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 331d
If I had to guess, I would speculate that their motivation is a long-term play to squash the general perception that Android has more malware (and is therefor less secure) than iPhone. Just about every article I've seen to that effect includes (1) enable unknown sources, and (2) install this malware app; so they probably see the current hurdles as insufficient and intend to perma-ban dev accounts that they find signing malware apps.
mr_satan@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 331d
I've never encountered this "bias". Where is this common?
migo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 331d
Mainstream
radiouser@crazypeople.online · 11 pts · 330d
The FSF phone can't come quick enough.
Kalon@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 332d
northface@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 330d
I was doing some research the other day and found this list:
https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm
fulner@social.mojo.fyi · 2 pts · 331d
@xia @memes OK, what did I miss in the news? Is Britain requiring Google to remove the ability to install apps from outside the play store?
user224@lemmy.sdf.org · 7 pts · 331d
Google is about to start requiring ID verification from developers to allow installation of their apps. "Unverified" apks will be blocked without GUI bypass.
Check "Google app developer verification", I don't have an article ready and my time is up.