It should be the other way around. AI should be reviewing code. AI should be debugging code. Instead, it is allegedly doing the opposite. It’s creating code that requires human review and is generating code that requires humans to debug. This is the opposite of useful.
Having a huge existing codebase and having an AI that scan the entire codebase and find actual bugs would be a godsend. Giving humans more drudgework is the opposite of helpful.
3 Comments
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 302d
Wut.
sturger@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 302d
It should be the other way around. AI should be reviewing code. AI should be debugging code. Instead, it is allegedly doing the opposite. It’s creating code that requires human review and is generating code that requires humans to debug. This is the opposite of useful.
Having a huge existing codebase and having an AI that scan the entire codebase and find actual bugs would be a godsend. Giving humans more drudgework is the opposite of helpful.
eleijeep@piefed.social · 1 pts · 302d
slop