Trump threatens to sue BBC over Panorama edit that he says made his Jan 6 speech appear to urge violence

In fairness, the unedited speech urged violence...

Let's see... Trump lost. Therefor, he had no business being there the day votes were being verified by Congress.

Good luck during discovery, pedo

I watched the entire J6 "rally" in real time. The message was coded, but clear. That mob was doing exactly what the people on stage wanted it to do.

If anything, you'd have to edit their speeches in order to not show that they were urging that crowd to fight.

He did do that, we all know he did that. I'm beyond sick at these motherfuckers who keep refuting reality.

I think the Beeb has told him to get stuffed, on the money. They know he's as potent as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor at this point.

For the same reasons..

Ugh, they apologized to this asshole.

Mr Prescott, who until June 2025 was an independent adviser to the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Board, also highlights serious problems with BBC Arabic’s reporting on Gaza, in which it apparently gives extensive space to the views of Hamas.

I was curious what this meant, so I read the relevant section and while some of the arguments seem suspect, there were definitely massive red flags with the policies of BBC Arabic.

Haven't read the US election part yet, but the points raised in the intro don't sound coherent.

EDIT: The US election part is a lot less convincing. They should have explicitly stated that they are combining two separate sections from the speech, but the argument seems more like a technicality. Some other minor points were fair, but there were a lot of incoherent arguments. One example.

The BBC sometimes fell into using, without attribution, contested language such as “reproductive rights”. This signals to many BBC viewers, particularly those in America, a biased mindset.

Reproductive rights isn't a contested term.

You can't sue people from prison, silly rapist. Tricks are not for kids.

Wait til bro gets a Chris Morris edit

How dare they hear the dog whistle?!

Meanwhile they busily edit anything a Democrat says to indicate something other than what the context of the statement was.