I'm still chunking through this and related entries, but this was a convenient starting point for me.
I'm generally inclined to think of frameworks of truth-finding as having developed in a sort of taxonomy, like a tree. While groups will evaluate the same data similarly up to a point, say, problems with depth perception and colorblindness don't prevent people from seeing something similar as conventional-seeing people do, the different methods of evaluating the same data come from context/field-specific standards, faculties, or methods.
If a thing description is adequately modally robust or is true across different viewpoints, that seems to me a good indication it is true.
9 Comments
Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de · 3 pts · 2y
If something is in accordance with objective reality, it must be true.
fbsz@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 2y
How do you classify by what you observe as reality, and further it could be true?
oldGregg@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 2y
Something that is measuerable and repeatable. And that anyone repeating with the same variables will get the same result.
fbsz@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 2y
Can you elaborate and give much more detail about your claim?
yikaft@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth/
I'm still chunking through this and related entries, but this was a convenient starting point for me.
I'm generally inclined to think of frameworks of truth-finding as having developed in a sort of taxonomy, like a tree. While groups will evaluate the same data similarly up to a point, say, problems with depth perception and colorblindness don't prevent people from seeing something similar as conventional-seeing people do, the different methods of evaluating the same data come from context/field-specific standards, faculties, or methods.
If a
thingdescription is adequately modally robust or is true across different viewpoints, that seems to me a good indication it is true.dbx12@programming.dev · 1 pts · 2y
Can it be scientifically proven? Then it's the truth.
Hexagon@feddit.it · 2 pts · 2y
... it's assumed to be true, until proven otherwise
fbsz@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 2y
What if our assumptions could be false? What gurantees it be truth? Or in other words, why it shouldnt be false?
Spzi@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 2y
Model aligns with Reality.