On contrarian history – Going Medieval

https://going-medieval.com/2025/11/25/on-contrarian-history/

arguing that the ‘Fall of Rome’ created a ‘Dark Ages’ which was bad and is a term that is pejorative from a place of total ignorance.

44 points · 9 comments · view on lemmy.world

9 Comments

Rose_Thorne@lemmy.zip · 18 pts · 282d (3 replies)

Can we get more historical knowledge distributed this way?

And applied directly to my face?

TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 282d

HubertManne@piefed.social · 6 pts · 282d (1 reply)

ok but I get to watch.

apotheotic@beehaw.org · 3 pts · 281d

OK but I get to wear the booty shorts

DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 282d

Ignorant layperson here, less ignorant now. Thank you.

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 282d

It's been a long time since I've had so much fun learning so much about history. Gimme more. GIMME

IntriguedIceberg@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 281d

This was a great read! Had a lot of fun with it and got educated.

azi@mander.xyz · -1 pts · 281d

no the term pretty universally refers to intellectual decline. that's why historians no longer use it

SnailMagnitude@mander.xyz · -1 pts · 281d

It's dark age Europe, because of the chuch.

Aquinas apologetics in there too, yay.

Fortunately no one owns the period or phrase and we are free to call dark age Europe dark age Europe if we wish, and I couldn't give a fuck if someone with a sticker thinks otherwise.

Academia as everything else runs on trends, fashions and the needs of the masses, even those that don't go to masses anymore.