VICTORY: Kenyan Court Rules “Sharing Seeds is Not a Crime” in Landmark Verdict for Food Sovereignty
https://www.greenpeace.org/africa/en/press/59598/historic-victory-kenyan-court-rules-sharing-seeds-is-not-a-crime-in-landmark-verdict-for-food-sovereignty/
323 points · 12 comments · view on lemmy.world
12 Comments
logi@piefed.world · 46 pts · 273d
Reuters says the same thing with more context and less gushing:
Very good news indeed! The global IP regime around seeds is pretty bad, but this is not affecting that. It's about even worse restrictions in Kenya specifically.
chuckleslord@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 273d
America: Shame about that coup you're about to experience
Aggravationstation@feddit.uk · 15 pts · 272d
What about eating seeds, as a pass time activity?
hydroxycotton@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 272d
Just depend on the toxicity of your city, really.
Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 272d
What if you want to own the world?
TootSweet@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 273d
Now do all the other countries.
UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 272d
Fuck you Monsanto
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 272d
That's seems like a great way to make sure no large seed company will ever do business in your country ever again.
I'm all for abolishing IP laws for any area, but it's kinda dumb to lead the way if you develop basically no new products yourself.
EDIT: After some more reading, I've found this is a TERRIBLE article. The Kenyan law was that farmers literally couldn’t share or sell ANY seeds, including 200 year old heirloom crops. If you produced a new cultivar based on heirloom seeds, that wasn't just free to use, it was ILLEGAL unless you were a registered seed company. That insanity has been fixed now.
serendepity@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 272d
There are plenty of universities in the world that actively research and freely share their hybrid, advanced cultivars. Not everything needs to be somebody’s property. Knowledge can be and is freely shared.
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 272d
The problem is that hybrid seeds require seperate production, being hybrids.
The greenpeace article is actually kinda crap, because this whole thing isn't the usual "Farmers aren't allowed to pirate these fancy modern seeds", it's because the Kenyan law was that farmers literally couldn't share ANY seeds, including 200 year old heirloom crops. A farmer could literally be fined if they gave a home-grown tomato to their neighbor, because they're not a seed company. And that's obviously absurd, and we should applaud it being stopped.
They haven't really changed anything else.
lauha@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 272d
People get to share seeds and large corporations stay out. Sounds more like a win-win to me.
julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 272d
Agriculture is inherently "developing new products" you fundamentally cannot stop innovating because the growth of a plant is itself a selection step.
Take your point that it might discourage certain types of agri business. But aks yourself: given protection will they work to maximise the benefit to farmers or will they innovate to maximise their own profits (E.g. By creating quasi-monopolies or increasing farms' dependence on them)?