Yes, but you need something with turbines to regulate power flow during off-peak. Hydropower can do that in some places, but not everywhere. That's the gap that nuclear should be aiming for (replace coal plants as minimum power regulator)
ADHD and ASD have extremely high comorbidity rates (10% of ADHDers and 50% of ASDers have both). Might, uh, might want to check on that. Cause routine and ADHD fit like hand in shoe
Yeah, so maybe take some off the internet. You're being dangerously edgy, bordering on straight up anti-social. Projecting the worst qualities on people, apropos nothing, is not a good look.
Nuh-uh. They had the benefit of the doubt before, no longer. Have they brought back DEI initiatives? No, so they can fucking burn in a hole for all I care. They not getting my money.
Love the description. The painting is actually famous cause it was stolen in 1911. It's... a fine piece of DaVinci's but it was the theft that made it the icon it is today.
Also, the theft was based as fuck. Stolen since the art should be in Italy. I don't disagree that countries should get first dibs on their historic works of art, over whatever country stole or bought it. (Seriously, the Elgin Marbles and like 90% of the British national museum should be returned to the countries they were stolen from)
Don't care, man. Facebook made me hate the whole concept of selling my friends and family to a corpo syndicate in order to... communicate with them. I can text, man.
By stating that Ukraine sympathize with nazis, you're lending credence to Russia's bullshit casus belli. If this conversation with OP was happening in a vacuum where context didn't matter, you'd have a strong argument that you didn't say they were right to invade because of it. But this is the real world, and propping up a paper-thin casus belli in a thread about Russia defending the same can really only be read as supporting Russia, here.
Comrade, this is exhausting. You're not winning hearts and minds by being a two-faced piece of shit. You do know that, right? Maybe examine why you're ashamed to support Russia if you really think they're worthy of support rather than pretending you're not saying the shit you are. Christ on bikes, man.
As someone who doesn't have a background in climate science, I think it's a really bad idea to look at this and start panicking without context. Just saying
Yeah, why wouldn't she just let the murderous psychopath that's protected by society if he decides to kill her do whatever he wants? /s
The fuck is wrong with y'all? You expect the untrained individual in this circumstance to act with more decorum and reason than the trained one. Be better
The problem is that you're not arguing anything. Your first comment is an ad hominem at best, and your second is an appeal to the unknown. You haven't argued anything.
Here, here's my argument. LLMs are built on neutral networks. They use a ridiculous amount of compute to "simulate neurons", but their neurons are not even a 100th of the power of an actual neuron, which is why this is a dead-end for AGI. You've probably seen this diagram before
And had it explained that each of the nodes in this image represents a virtual neuron. Assuming that AGI is achieved via the means we know right now, namely being human-like, then you'd probably expect creating a neural net with the complexity of a human brain, minus all the stuff needed for steering a meat-suit, would get us there.
The problem is that those little nodes are input-output machines that are ridiculously simple compared to real neurons. They take in inputs from every connection they have, based on internal weights and measures, and then they output a single value to all their output neurons. That value is a float between 0 and 1, representing some percentage of activation.
Real neurons, meanwhile, use neurotransmitters to communicate to their neighbors, not simple electrical signals. There are hundreds of those, but even if there were 10, then neural networks would be completely incapable of modeling a simple brain, let alone a human one.
Why? Because that means each of those nodes in the neural net would need 10 separate inputs and outputs connected to all their existing nodes to even come close. That's a 100x more connections for every part of the node. And we're currently consuming basically every chip on earth to feed to this thing, and it's not even 1/100th the complexity needed for even a dumbed down neuron, let alone a realistic one.
We invented a next token predictor. That isn't intelligence nor is it on the path to it, either. The word rocks aren't any closer to real intellect than the math rocks were. You just think they are cause words are the things that humans use to communicate across time and space.
The only ones spouting nonsense that it is are those whose business models require AGI to be achievable within the next decade. But, ya know, wish in one hand and all that.
Yes, but you need something with turbines to regulate power flow during off-peak. Hydropower can do that in some places, but not everywhere. That's the gap that nuclear should be aiming for (replace coal plants as minimum power regulator)
"Wow! The other side is literal demons, so how dare you hold the good guys to any kind of standard?!". There, is that what we were going for here?
Yes. Climate change is real. Not, uh, not what I'm saying, but thanks for clarifying.
ADHD and ASD have extremely high comorbidity rates (10% of ADHDers and 50% of ASDers have both). Might, uh, might want to check on that. Cause routine and ADHD fit like hand in shoe
Source: am AuDHD
Yeah, so maybe take some off the internet. You're being dangerously edgy, bordering on straight up anti-social. Projecting the worst qualities on people, apropos nothing, is not a good look.
Oh yeah. Russia, historically great for indigenous groups.
Queer up, bitches
I mean, that shit is still around, just not in the corpo approved ad pages. It's only been, like, a year tops since I've seen a decapitation.
Nuh-uh. They had the benefit of the doubt before, no longer. Have they brought back DEI initiatives? No, so they can fucking burn in a hole for all I care. They not getting my money.
Love the description. The painting is actually famous cause it was stolen in 1911. It's... a fine piece of DaVinci's but it was the theft that made it the icon it is today.
Also, the theft was based as fuck. Stolen since the art should be in Italy. I don't disagree that countries should get first dibs on their historic works of art, over whatever country stole or bought it. (Seriously, the Elgin Marbles and like 90% of the British national museum should be returned to the countries they were stolen from)
Don't care, man. Facebook made me hate the whole concept of selling my friends and family to a corpo syndicate in order to... communicate with them. I can text, man.
By stating that Ukraine sympathize with nazis, you're lending credence to Russia's bullshit casus belli. If this conversation with OP was happening in a vacuum where context didn't matter, you'd have a strong argument that you didn't say they were right to invade because of it. But this is the real world, and propping up a paper-thin casus belli in a thread about Russia defending the same can really only be read as supporting Russia, here.
Comrade, this is exhausting. You're not winning hearts and minds by being a two-faced piece of shit. You do know that, right? Maybe examine why you're ashamed to support Russia if you really think they're worthy of support rather than pretending you're not saying the shit you are. Christ on bikes, man.
As someone who doesn't have a background in climate science, I think it's a really bad idea to look at this and start panicking without context. Just saying
Shyest or shiest. Man, both those look wrong (they're both right, I checked).
Yeah, why wouldn't she just let the murderous psychopath that's protected by society if he decides to kill her do whatever he wants? /s
The fuck is wrong with y'all? You expect the untrained individual in this circumstance to act with more decorum and reason than the trained one. Be better
Ah! Cylon toaster, not toaster toaster. And certainly not a Cylon toaster toaster
The problem is that you're not arguing anything. Your first comment is an ad hominem at best, and your second is an appeal to the unknown. You haven't argued anything.
Here, here's my argument. LLMs are built on neutral networks. They use a ridiculous amount of compute to "simulate neurons", but their neurons are not even a 100th of the power of an actual neuron, which is why this is a dead-end for AGI. You've probably seen this diagram before
And had it explained that each of the nodes in this image represents a virtual neuron. Assuming that AGI is achieved via the means we know right now, namely being human-like, then you'd probably expect creating a neural net with the complexity of a human brain, minus all the stuff needed for steering a meat-suit, would get us there.
The problem is that those little nodes are input-output machines that are ridiculously simple compared to real neurons. They take in inputs from every connection they have, based on internal weights and measures, and then they output a single value to all their output neurons. That value is a float between 0 and 1, representing some percentage of activation.
Real neurons, meanwhile, use neurotransmitters to communicate to their neighbors, not simple electrical signals. There are hundreds of those, but even if there were 10, then neural networks would be completely incapable of modeling a simple brain, let alone a human one.
Why? Because that means each of those nodes in the neural net would need 10 separate inputs and outputs connected to all their existing nodes to even come close. That's a 100x more connections for every part of the node. And we're currently consuming basically every chip on earth to feed to this thing, and it's not even 1/100th the complexity needed for even a dumbed down neuron, let alone a realistic one.
... what? No, they very much do. What are you talking about?
We invented a next token predictor. That isn't intelligence nor is it on the path to it, either. The word rocks aren't any closer to real intellect than the math rocks were. You just think they are cause words are the things that humans use to communicate across time and space.
The only ones spouting nonsense that it is are those whose business models require AGI to be achievable within the next decade. But, ya know, wish in one hand and all that.
Man, fuck that. Em dashes are cool and I'm not giving them up just cause some fucking toaster uses it.