I wondered about the robots.txt
I can see the case for it, I could also see the case for allowing at least Google to index the site.
Has there been some discussion about this previously?
I wondered about the robots.txt
I can see the case for it, I could also see the case for allowing at least Google to index the site.
Has there been some discussion about this previously?
8 Comments
poVoq@slrpnk.net · 8 pts · 273d
At this point we try to block pretty much everything even remotely related to AI companies.
Soon we will probably have to block Chrome browsers when they start to use them to scrape websites without their users knowing (yes that is why AI companies started to make their own browsers and Mozilla is planning the same proudly proclaiming how "stealthy" they can be with that.).
Google search results have become so useless that I see little point left trying to accomodate their search bot 🤷
Yes I am bitter and can't wait for the AI bubble to pop.
sam_uk@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 273d
It's any day now I think, EU pension funds are moving out https://www.removepaywall.com/search?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcontent%2F9d90d557-48e5-4f4b-a927-88071cef8ea9
Would you be up for re-enabling Google indexing? It is crappy, but still..
poVoq@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 273d
Not very motivated, but I can look into it.
sam_uk@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 273d
I think it would just be
poVoq@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 272d
Ok I tried to allow-list some search engine spiders in the robot.txt, however they will probably still just run into the AI scraper block if they act too shady.
But honestly, I highly doubt we will get much traffic from Google search. It's completely gone to shit these days.
Nemo@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 273d
There has and IIRC it's to help prevent scraping.
umbra@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 273d
sam_uk@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 273d
In the bottom
Blocks all scrapers and superseeds the text above AFAIK
umbra@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 273d
sam_uk@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 273d
I wonder if it was a short term fix that got forgotten about..