And consider: if the widest part of a raccoon compresses to 4" on one axis, its entirely plausible you could pack two in side by side on the narrower axis, perhaps angled in a V shape, with another across above them, against the roof of the sphincter
I wouldn't bet on a 4th, but also would not rule it out without firmer numbers than I have.
21 Comments
over_clox@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 262d
7 inches diameter, radius, or circumference?
We need more information, for reasons...
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 262d
I feel like they are probably just guesstimating by using goatse as a source, so diameter?
lauha@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 262d
Any normal person would assume diameter and no-one outside of mathematics would assume radius in this context.
cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 262d
I've spent some time in dungeons. I might assume radius.
lauha@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 261d
I said normal person. Potholers don't count.
Pulptastic@midwest.social · 2 pts · 262d
My first assumption was diameter but then thinking about how this is tested I bet it is width, so half circumference.
That means D=4.45” so just over one raccoon, maybe one raccoon and a trinket it found and won’t let go.
FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com · 12 pts · 262d
I endorse this message
slothrop@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 262d
Two Fists Up!
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 262d
Why does the first sentence feel like a shitty loading screen tip?
OopsOverbombing@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 262d
Yeah the new Fortnite update is weird
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 262d
These are all the new maps that they've added (and that's a newspaper).
cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 262d
I don't know but I want to make a game now, just to include this in the tips.
Flickerby@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 262d
Classic DND story
gigastasio@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 262d
cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 262d
Well, that's two parallel raccoons.
I assume with work you can do raccoon multiplexing on multiple axes.
cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 262d
looks up raccoon skeleton geometry and algorithms to solve square packing problem
Because I'm pretty sure it's more than two.
_stranger_@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 262d
Ok, yes, but... it's likely not three. And fractional racoons aren't recommended for...well anything really.
cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 262d
Do not ask if you should, ask only if you could!
And consider: if the widest part of a raccoon compresses to 4" on one axis, its entirely plausible you could pack two in side by side on the narrower axis, perhaps angled in a V shape, with another across above them, against the roof of the sphincter
I wouldn't bet on a 4th, but also would not rule it out without firmer numbers than I have.
quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 262d
The same way not everyone can run like Usain Bolt not everyone can stretch like Goatse.
One racoon tops, in a good day.
tacosanonymous@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 262d
How many rabbits is that? Asking for a friend.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 262d
As the clip goes, "Armageddon!"
diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 262d
Everything is possible when you believe yourself 💪