ruledacted

287 points · 12 comments · view on lemmy.world

12 Comments

Zachariah@lemmy.world · 49 pts · 223d (7 replies)

this can’t be true

Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de · 65 pts · 223d (6 replies)

I can't believe it myself, but according to the Guardian it's true.

Zachariah@lemmy.world · 50 pts · 223d (2 replies)

I’m sorry. I meant to say:
of-fucking-course it’s true
*shakes head*

Duranie@leminal.space · 29 pts · 223d (1 reply)

The kicker is, things like this have happened in the past with redacted materials (there was a famous one a few years back, but now I can't remember what it was.) Which begs the question - was this incompetence, or malicious compliance?

TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 19 pts · 223d

My money is on the incompetence of Trump loyalists

rtxn@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 223d (1 reply)

Here's a link that doesn't ransom your private data: https://archive.md/lO08a

somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 223d

clodflare :(

obsidianfoxxy7870@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 221d

I am not suprised they don't know how to redact documents.

tynansdtm@lemmy.ml · 30 pts · 223d

Careful, you might get arrested for viewing the page source or something.

Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 17 pts · 222d (1 reply)

crazy, but why the fuck does someone with "anonymus" have the blue check 😭

themagzuz@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 18 pts · 222d

you get a blue check for paying something like $9/month. very good feature because it instantly tells you that you can entirely disregard the post you're about to read because it was written by someone stupid enough to give money to the app formerly known as twitter (and thus elon musk) every month

night_petal@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 222d

This is real. However, believing that the blacked out portions are what truly needed to be redacted by this admin seems naive. Redacting things properly is one of the few things that the US does well.

Victims names etc. are there, but as long as a certain tanning cream gremlins appearances are "exaggerated and false," they don't care.