The ROG XREAL R1 gaming glasses let you game anywhere on a 171-inch 240Hz virtual screen
https://rog.asus.com/articles/gaming-monitors/the-rog-xreal-glasses-r1-bring-big-screen-pc-and-console-gaming-in-a-small-wearable-package/
44 points · 15 comments · view on lemmy.world
15 Comments
FauxLiving@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 236d
May save you a click:
No price yet, similar products have launched at $699
termaxima@slrpnk.net · 6 pts · 235d
171-inch doesn't make any sense in this context.
We know it's 1080p, but what definition ? In other words, how far does that supposedly "171 inch" TV sit from your face ?
Matty_r@programming.dev · 4 pts · 235d
"like sitting in front of a whopping 171-inch display from four meters away"
oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 235d
Say that second sentence again, but slowly.
Arcka@midwest.social · 2 pts · 235d
Right? 1080p is literally resolution of 1920x1080.
Maybe they meant to say Dot Pitch?
termaxima@slrpnk.net · 0 pts · 234d
I meant definition.
termaxima@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 234d
I meant definition. Aka pixels per centimeter squared.
johntash@eviltoast.org · 5 pts · 236d
I'm kind of interested depending on pricing. Using it as a monitor would be neat too
FruitLips@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 235d
I'm on my third pair, the Viture pro, 120hz / 1080p oled and I think they're pretty neat. Particularly Viture's individual dials for your eyes if you're a little near sighted. Had the Xreal before, maybe they got better but after going and and getting the lense inserts adjusted to my prescription by an optometrist, (which took a couple weeks and cost an additional ~$100) they still were just a little off which sucks for text- the fuzzies manifest differently with minute differences in distance from your eyes, so they all kinda clamp on your head and it hurts before long without a hat or something to better distribute the pressure. Ymmv, I'd still recommend if you're at all a techie. No discernable pixels whatsoever and they've been easy enough to buy n sell used ^_^
HubertManne@piefed.social · 3 pts · 236d
mmmm. these kinda look like you could wear them with a pair of glasses behind them.
johntash@eviltoast.org · 2 pts · 236d
They come with a thing you can put prescription lenses in, so maybe!
HubertManne@piefed.social · 1 pts · 235d
that kinda sounds like no then. usually being able to put in lenses suggests its not meant to be worn with glasses.
WolfLink@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 236d
These things always have light isolation issues. It’s why the google glass failed and why Apple and Microsoft tried to do AR based on a VR headset instead of glasses like this.
dev_null@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 235d
No, that's not why Google Glass failed. It would have failed even with a perfect display.
verdi@feddit.org · 1 pts · 231d
Not even thinking of anything till the steam frame is out!