Of course reports of UFO sightings would go down after everyone has smartphones - nobody spends time staring up at the sky anymore since they have their faces buried in a screen.
There's a significant possibility that the technology will not require enormous amounts of compute to train sooner than some might think. None of these companies want to spend money they don't have to.
While a program is eligible for copyright, anything small enough to be considered a snippet likely wouldn't be unless it is sufficiently expressive or original.
It doesn't need to be tied to a mechanism which reduces visibility.
I support rate-limiting. I also feel that clients should enable their users to configure their own views, and be able to cast their votes as they see fit without any authoritarian push to control what should be their choice.
That metaphor would be applicable if you could see through the person. Down votes could be implemented in a way which you could just ignore or disable in your client without depriving others of a signal they value.
Labeling things opposite of your preference as 'warfare' and 'cancer' and declaring they lead to a specific outcome without proof is much worse.
We can have more minimum-resistance feedback signals than just neutral or positive. We don't need to pretend that every comment or interaction will be sunshine and rainbows. It doesn't need to be tied to a mechanism which reduces visibility.
Rule breaking and bad faith actors / trolling should instead be reported and handled via moderation. Downvotes should simply be the opposite of an upvote.
Decrypting? I don't think any of the similar-strength protection measures which have been defeated were done by brute-forcing the decryption key. There would undoubtedly be attacks which exploit other flaws.
That said, I agree that libre hardware would be the better option.
for a privacy-centered set of software developers to have
(Especially since they're "not some small-fry company") No developers would have been involved in this, it was 100% marketing dept and likely some service provider they use.
This must be from AI since it is so confidently wrong.
Of course reports of UFO sightings would go down after everyone has smartphones - nobody spends time staring up at the sky anymore since they have their faces buried in a screen.
Reading comprehension: you literally wrote the word "missed" in the comment I replied to. 😅
Since it may have gone over your head, my previous comment was wordplay. You can have a pass if English isn't your first language.
I'm certain Ricky hasn't missed them even a little bit.
It literally isn't.
Copying is not theft.
There's a significant possibility that the technology will not require enormous amounts of compute to train sooner than some might think. None of these companies want to spend money they don't have to.
While a program is eligible for copyright, anything small enough to be considered a snippet likely wouldn't be unless it is sufficiently expressive or original.
That's how they got the name
As I posted above:
I support rate-limiting. I also feel that clients should enable their users to configure their own views, and be able to cast their votes as they see fit without any authoritarian push to control what should be their choice.
That metaphor would be applicable if you could see through the person. Down votes could be implemented in a way which you could just ignore or disable in your client without depriving others of a signal they value.
Labeling things opposite of your preference as 'warfare' and 'cancer' and declaring they lead to a specific outcome without proof is much worse.
We can have more minimum-resistance feedback signals than just neutral or positive. We don't need to pretend that every comment or interaction will be sunshine and rainbows. It doesn't need to be tied to a mechanism which reduces visibility.
Rule breaking and bad faith actors / trolling should instead be reported and handled via moderation. Downvotes should simply be the opposite of an upvote.
Which would never be rooted or jailbroken in the first place so why even bring it up in this this context?
Decrypting? I don't think any of the similar-strength protection measures which have been defeated were done by brute-forcing the decryption key. There would undoubtedly be attacks which exploit other flaws.
That said, I agree that libre hardware would be the better option.
Also, public policy should ensure nobody goes hungry.
(Especially since they're "not some small-fry company") No developers would have been involved in this, it was 100% marketing dept and likely some service provider they use.
Agreed! However, I took the comment above yours to be referring to design.
Everything since the manga have been based on it?
While this Motoko looks very similar, some of the other characters in this version are the furthest from the original IMO.